Pass difficulty
85.0%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 65
requires 100 passes
Player profile
Aurélio Gabriel Ulineia Buta
Eintracht Frankfurt · Right Wing Back · DEF
Matches observed2
Pass attempts65
Limited sampleActual completion
86.2%
56 completed passes
Pass difficulty
85.0%
How difficult a pass was to complete.
Actual vs. expected passing
+1.1 pp
+0.7 completions vs model expectation
Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.
Player intelligence
Position profile
DEF context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.
Insufficient eligible position metrics for a meaningful radar.
Style
Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.
Under-pressure pass rate
13.8%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 65
requires 100 passes
Progressive pass rate
12.3%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 65
requires 100 passes
Long-pass rate
9.2%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 65
requires 100 passes
Average forward distance
-1.9 units
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 65
requires 100 passes
Positive forward distance / 100 passes
352.5 units
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 65
requires 100 passes
Final-third entries / 100 passes
7.692
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 65
requires 100 passes
Carry share of actions
45.7%
74th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 116
Progressive carry rate
5.7%
83rd percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 53
Progressive action rate
9.5%
48th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 116
Under-pressure action rate
21.6%
81st percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 116
Shots / observed match
0.50 / match
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 1
requires 20 shots
xG / shot
3.7%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 1
requires 20 shots
Performance
Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.
Actual vs. expected passing
+1.1 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 65
requires 100 passes
Under-pressure completion above expected
-10.9 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 13 eligible peers · sample 9
requires 20 pressure passes
Progressive completion above expected
+9.1 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 17 eligible peers · sample 8
requires 20 progressive passes
Long-pass completion above expected
-0.7 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 21 eligible peers · sample 6
requires 20 long passes
Goals above expected
-0.037
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 1
requires 20 shots
Overall impact / 100 actions
0.051
78th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 116
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.020
57th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 63
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Carrying impact / 100 carries
0.135
83rd percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 53
Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
0.097
86th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 116
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
0.032
74th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 116
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Playing style
Safe Circulator
Position-relative style among eligible DEF players.
Style separation0.545
Progressive-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty (higher)
Positive forward distance / 100 passes (lower)
Long-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty+0.21 z
Under-pressure pass rate+0.28 z
Progressive-pass rate-0.54 z
Long-pass rate-1.00 z
Positive forward distance / 100 passes-2.16 z
Carry share of actions+0.62 z
Bars are z-scores relative to eligible positional peers, not percentiles or ratings. Distance-based style separation, not a probability. Smaller values mean the player lies nearer the boundary between the two archetypes.
Role Fit
DEF role
How closely a player's playing style matches this role. Compared with Bayer Leverkusen's observed DEF role.
#6 of 66Comparable external defensive candidatesRaw distance: 0.588
Lower distance means closer stylistic resemblance.
Closest stylistic dimensions
- Progressive passing rate
- Carry involvement
- Long-pass rate
Largest stylistic difference
Forward distance per 100 passes
limited sampleObserved across 2 matchesRole: 34 matches · 9 contributors
Role Fit compares observed playing style. It does not predict player quality, transfer success, or future performance.
Expected Goals
Non-penalty shooting
Goals above expected is descriptive for this observed sample, not a definitive finishing-skill rating.
Shots
1
1 matches observed
Goals
0
Total xG
0.0
Goals above expected
-0.0
xG / shot
0.0
0.0% goals / shot
Limited sample: fewer than 20 non-penalty shots.
Campos visualization
Shot map
Non-penalty xG is encoded by marker size and color. Preserved penalties have no modeled xG.
Shots1
Goals0
xG0.04
xG0.00 – 1.00
Green outline = GoalNormal outline = Non-goal
Attacking impact
Impact of passes and carries
Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.
Overall impact / 100 actions
+0.051
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.020
Carrying impact / 100 carries
+0.135
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
+0.097
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
+0.032
116 actions · 63 passes · 53 carries · 58.6% increased attacking value
Campos visualization
Carry value map
Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.
Situational execution
Under pressure
9 attempts
- Actual
- 66.7%
- Pass difficulty
- 77.5%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -10.9 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Progressive passing
8 attempts
- Actual
- 62.5%
- Pass difficulty
- 53.4%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- +9.1 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Long passing
6 attempts
- Actual
- 66.7%
- Pass difficulty
- 67.4%
Progression profile
Progressive-pass rate
12.3%
Pressure-pass rate
13.8%
Average forward distance
-1.9 m
Positive forward distance / 100
352.5 m
Final-third entries / 100
7.7
Campos visualization
Pass map
Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.
Showing 1–65 of 65 passes
CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
- Pass difficulty
- 33.7%
- Outcome
- Incomplete
- Attacking impact
- -0.0273
- Value before
- 0.0273
- Value after
- 0.0000
- Length
- 16.0 m
- Context
- Progressive
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.
Similar playing styles
Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.
100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.
Limited sample: this player's style profile is based on 2 observed matches, so nearest-neighbor rankings may be less stable.
Style similarity
81.9 / 100
Expected Completion RateCarry Share Of ActionsProgressive Pass Rate
Sample support: Limited · 2 limiting matches
Observed: 2 vs 2 matches
Style similarity
74.6 / 100