Pass difficulty
81.8%
14th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 2159
Player profile
Alejandro Grimaldo García
Bayer Leverkusen · Left Wing Back · DEF
Matches observed33
Pass attempts2,159
Reliable sampleActual completion
82.6%
1,783 completed passes
Pass difficulty
81.8%
How difficult a pass was to complete.
Actual vs. expected passing
+0.8 pp
+17.7 completions vs model expectation
Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.
Player intelligence
Position profile
DEF context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.
Style
Performance
0–100 empirical percentiles among eligible same-position peers.
Style
Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.
Under-pressure pass rate
12.5%
64th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 2159
Progressive pass rate
18.5%
91st percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 2159
Long-pass rate
11.3%
27th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 2159
Average forward distance
-1.2 units
14th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 2159
Positive forward distance / 100 passes
452.5 units
9th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 2159
Final-third entries / 100 passes
5.929
18th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 2159
Carry share of actions
43.6%
42nd percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 3742
Progressive carry rate
3.6%
67th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 1630
Progressive action rate
12.0%
67th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 3742
Under-pressure action rate
17.6%
61st percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 3742
Shots / observed match
2.15 / match
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 71
requires 10 eligible position peers
xG / shot
7.2%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 71
requires 10 eligible position peers
Performance
Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.
Actual vs. expected passing
+0.8 pp
50th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 2159
Under-pressure completion above expected
-2.2 pp
0th percentile among DEF players
n = 13 eligible peers · sample 269
Progressive completion above expected
+2.2 pp
44th percentile among DEF players
n = 17 eligible peers · sample 400
Long-pass completion above expected
-0.2 pp
65th percentile among DEF players
n = 21 eligible peers · sample 243
Goals above expected
4.897
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 71
requires 10 eligible position peers
Overall impact / 100 actions
0.009
46th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 3742
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.060
39th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 2112
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Carrying impact / 100 carries
0.098
72nd percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 1630
Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
0.066
81st percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 3742
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
0.009
34th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 3742
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Playing style
Safe Circulator
Position-relative style among eligible DEF players.
Style separation0.349
Progressive-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty (higher)
Positive forward distance / 100 passes (lower)
Long-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty-0.36 z
Under-pressure pass rate+0.03 z
Progressive-pass rate+0.32 z
Long-pass rate-0.70 z
Positive forward distance / 100 passes-1.75 z
Carry share of actions-0.14 z
Bars are z-scores relative to eligible positional peers, not percentiles or ratings. Distance-based style separation, not a probability. Smaller values mean the player lies nearer the boundary between the two archetypes.
Role Fit
DEF role
How closely a player's playing style matches this role. Compared with the observed role of Leverkusen's other DEF contributors.
#7 of 9Comparable current-team defensive profilesRaw distance: 0.927
Lower distance means closer stylistic resemblance.
Closest stylistic dimensions
- Passes under pressure
- Long-pass rate
- Forward distance per 100 passes
Largest stylistic difference
Expected completion rate
higher sampleObserved across 33 matchesRole: 34 matches · 8 contributors
Role Fit compares observed playing style. It does not predict player quality, transfer success, or future performance.
Expected Goals
Non-penalty shooting
Goals above expected is descriptive for this observed sample, not a definitive finishing-skill rating.
Shots
71
30 matches observed
Goals
10
Total xG
5.1
Goals above expected
+4.9
xG / shot
0.1
14.1% goals / shot
Campos visualization
Shot map
Non-penalty xG is encoded by marker size and color. Preserved penalties have no modeled xG.
Shots71
Goals10
xG5.10
xG0.00 – 1.00
Foot
Header
Set piece
Corner
Green outline = GoalNormal outline = Non-goal
Attacking impact
Impact of passes and carries
Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.
Overall impact / 100 actions
+0.009
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.060
Carrying impact / 100 carries
+0.098
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
+0.066
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
+0.009
3,742 actions · 2,112 passes · 1,630 carries · 49.2% increased attacking value
Campos visualization
Carry value map
Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.
Situational execution
Under pressure
269 attempts
- Actual
- 76.6%
- Pass difficulty
- 78.8%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -2.2 pp
Progressive passing
400 attempts
- Actual
- 47.3%
- Pass difficulty
- 45.0%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- +2.2 pp
Long passing
243 attempts
- Actual
- 47.3%
- Pass difficulty
- 47.5%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -0.2 pp
Progression profile
Progressive-pass rate
18.5%
Pressure-pass rate
12.5%
Average forward distance
-1.2 m
Positive forward distance / 100
452.5 m
Final-third entries / 100
5.9
Campos visualization
Pass map
Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.
Showing 1–200 of 2,159 passes
CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
- Pass difficulty
- 98.8%
- Outcome
- Completed
- Attacking impact
- -0.0046
- Value before
- 0.0149
- Value after
- 0.0104
- Length
- 20.3 m
- Context
- Standard
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.
Similar playing styles
Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.
100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.
Style similarity
73.4 / 100
Pressure Pass RateLong Pass RatePositive Forward Distance Per 100 Passes
Sample support: Limited · 2 limiting matches
Observed: 33 vs 2 matches
Style similarity
72.5 / 100
Expected Completion Rate