Pass difficulty
85.0%
32nd percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 108
Player profile
Arthur Augusto de Matos Soares
Bayer Leverkusen · Left Wing Back · DEF
Matches observed4
Pass attempts108
Reliable sampleActual completion
87.0%
94 completed passes
Pass difficulty
85.0%
How difficult a pass was to complete.
Actual vs. expected passing
+2.0 pp
+2.2 completions vs model expectation
Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.
Player intelligence
Position profile
DEF context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.
Style
Performance
0–100 empirical percentiles among eligible same-position peers.
Style
Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.
Under-pressure pass rate
13.9%
73rd percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 108
Progressive pass rate
19.4%
95th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 108
Long-pass rate
11.1%
23rd percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 108
Average forward distance
-2.3 units
0th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 108
Positive forward distance / 100 passes
454.1 units
14th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 108
Final-third entries / 100 passes
3.704
9th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 108
Carry share of actions
47.7%
95th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 199
Progressive carry rate
11.6%
94th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 95
Progressive action rate
16.1%
85th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 199
Under-pressure action rate
19.6%
71st percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 199
Shots / observed match
0.50 / match
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 2
requires 20 shots
xG / shot
3.0%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 2
requires 20 shots
Performance
Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.
Actual vs. expected passing
+2.0 pp
82nd percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 108
Under-pressure completion above expected
+1.3 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 13 eligible peers · sample 15
requires 20 pressure passes
Progressive completion above expected
+7.5 pp
75th percentile among DEF players
n = 17 eligible peers · sample 21
Long-pass completion above expected
+4.3 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 21 eligible peers · sample 12
requires 20 long passes
Goals above expected
-0.059
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 2
requires 20 shots
Overall impact / 100 actions
0.126
95th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 199
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Passing impact / 100 passes
0.093
94th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 104
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Carrying impact / 100 carries
0.162
87th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 95
Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
0.150
92nd percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 199
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
0.085
95th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 199
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Playing style
Safe Circulator
Position-relative style among eligible DEF players.
Style separation0.442
Progressive-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty (higher)
Positive forward distance / 100 passes (lower)
Long-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty+0.20 z
Under-pressure pass rate+0.29 z
Progressive-pass rate+0.44 z
Long-pass rate-0.72 z
Positive forward distance / 100 passes-1.74 z
Carry share of actions+1.36 z
Bars are z-scores relative to eligible positional peers, not percentiles or ratings. Distance-based style separation, not a probability. Smaller values mean the player lies nearer the boundary between the two archetypes.
Leverkusen Role Fit
DEF role
How closely a player's playing style matches this role. Compared with the observed role of Leverkusen's other DEF contributors.
Role distance · lower is closer0.659
CloserFarther
Strongest alignment
- Long Pass Rate
- Pressure Pass Rate
- Expected Completion Rate
Largest difference
Progressive Pass Rate
higher sampleObserved across 4 matchesRole: 34 matches · 8 contributors
Role Fit measures how closely a player's observed playing style resembles Bayer Leverkusen's observed positional-role style. It does not predict transfer success or future performance.
Expected Goals
Non-penalty shooting
Goals above expected is descriptive for this observed sample, not a definitive finishing-skill rating.
Shots
2
2 matches observed
Goals
0
Total xG
0.1
Goals above expected
-0.1
xG / shot
0.0
0.0% goals / shot
Limited sample: fewer than 20 non-penalty shots.
Campos visualization
Shot map
Non-penalty xG is encoded by marker size and color. Preserved penalties have no modeled xG.
Shots2
Goals0
xG0.06
xG0.00 – 1.00
Green outline = GoalNormal outline = Non-goal
Attacking impact
Impact of passes and carries
Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.
Overall impact / 100 actions
+0.126
Passing impact / 100 passes
+0.093
Carrying impact / 100 carries
+0.162
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
+0.150
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
+0.085
199 actions · 104 passes · 95 carries · 57.3% increased attacking value
Campos visualization
Carry value map
Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.
Situational execution
Under pressure
15 attempts
- Actual
- 80.0%
- Pass difficulty
- 78.7%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- +1.3 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Progressive passing
21 attempts
- Actual
- 57.1%
- Pass difficulty
- 49.6%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- +7.5 pp
Long passing
12 attempts
- Actual
- 75.0%
- Pass difficulty
- 70.7%
- Actual vs. expected passing
Progression profile
Progressive-pass rate
19.4%
Pressure-pass rate
13.9%
Average forward distance
-2.3 m
Positive forward distance / 100
454.1 m
Final-third entries / 100
3.7
Campos visualization
Pass map
Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.
Showing 1–108 of 108 passes
CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
- Pass difficulty
- 73.8%
- Outcome
- Completed
- Attacking impact
- 0.0001
- Value before
- 0.0109
- Value after
- 0.0111
- Length
- 8.8 m
- Context
- Standard
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.
Similar playing styles
Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.
100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.
Style similarity
74.6 / 100
Expected Completion RatePressure Pass RateLong Pass Rate
Sample support: Limited · 2 limiting matches
Observed: 4 vs 2 matches
Style similarity
73.8 / 100
Pressure Pass RateProgressive Pass Rate