Pass difficulty
85.2%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 80
requires 100 passes
Player profile
Noussair Mazraoui
Bayern Munich · Right Wing Back · DEF
Matches observed2
Pass attempts80
Limited sampleActual completion
85.0%
68 completed passes
Pass difficulty
85.2%
How difficult a pass was to complete.
Actual vs. expected passing
-0.2 pp
-0.2 completions vs model expectation
Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.
Player intelligence
Position profile
DEF context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.
Insufficient eligible position metrics for a meaningful radar.
Style
Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.
Under-pressure pass rate
11.3%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 80
requires 100 passes
Progressive pass rate
13.8%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 80
requires 100 passes
Long-pass rate
5.0%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 80
requires 100 passes
Average forward distance
-1.0 units
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 80
requires 100 passes
Positive forward distance / 100 passes
441.3 units
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 80
requires 100 passes
Final-third entries / 100 passes
7.500
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 80
requires 100 passes
Carry share of actions
46.2%
81st percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 143
Progressive carry rate
7.6%
88th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 66
Progressive action rate
11.2%
62nd percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 143
Under-pressure action rate
16.8%
54th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 143
Shots / observed match
0.50 / match
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 1
requires 20 shots
xG / shot
3.3%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 1
requires 20 shots
Performance
Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.
Actual vs. expected passing
-0.2 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 80
requires 100 passes
Under-pressure completion above expected
+3.3 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 13 eligible peers · sample 9
requires 20 pressure passes
Progressive completion above expected
+2.3 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 17 eligible peers · sample 11
requires 20 progressive passes
Long-pass completion above expected
+23.8 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 21 eligible peers · sample 4
requires 20 long passes
Goals above expected
-0.033
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 1
requires 20 shots
Overall impact / 100 actions
0.071
87th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 143
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Passing impact / 100 passes
0.023
74th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 77
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Carrying impact / 100 carries
0.127
81st percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 66
Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
0.111
88th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 143
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
0.018
52nd percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 143
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Playing style
Safe Circulator
Position-relative style among eligible DEF players.
Style separation0.533
Progressive-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty (higher)
Positive forward distance / 100 passes (lower)
Long-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty+0.24 z
Under-pressure pass rate-0.19 z
Progressive-pass rate-0.34 z
Long-pass rate-1.64 z
Positive forward distance / 100 passes-1.80 z
Carry share of actions+0.79 z
Bars are z-scores relative to eligible positional peers, not percentiles or ratings. Distance-based style separation, not a probability. Smaller values mean the player lies nearer the boundary between the two archetypes.
Leverkusen Role Fit
DEF role
How closely a player's playing style matches this role. Compared with Bayer Leverkusen's observed DEF role.
Role distance · lower is closer0.538
CloserFarther
Strongest alignment
- Carry Share Of Actions
- Pressure Pass Rate
- Progressive Pass Rate
Largest difference
Positive Forward Distance Per 100 Passes
limited sampleObserved across 2 matchesRole: 34 matches · 9 contributors
Role Fit measures how closely a player's observed playing style resembles Bayer Leverkusen's observed positional-role style. It does not predict transfer success or future performance.
Expected Goals
Non-penalty shooting
Goals above expected is descriptive for this observed sample, not a definitive finishing-skill rating.
Shots
1
1 matches observed
Goals
0
Total xG
0.0
Goals above expected
-0.0
xG / shot
0.0
0.0% goals / shot
Limited sample: fewer than 20 non-penalty shots.
Campos visualization
Shot map
Non-penalty xG is encoded by marker size and color. Preserved penalties have no modeled xG.
Shots1
Goals0
xG0.03
xG0.00 – 1.00
Green outline = GoalNormal outline = Non-goal
Attacking impact
Impact of passes and carries
Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.
Overall impact / 100 actions
+0.071
Passing impact / 100 passes
+0.023
Carrying impact / 100 carries
+0.127
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
+0.111
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
+0.018
143 actions · 77 passes · 66 carries · 49.0% increased attacking value
Campos visualization
Carry value map
Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.
Situational execution
Under pressure
9 attempts
- Actual
- 66.7%
- Pass difficulty
- 63.4%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- +3.3 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Progressive passing
11 attempts
- Actual
- 45.5%
- Pass difficulty
- 43.1%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- +2.3 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Long passing
4 attempts
- Actual
- 50.0%
- Pass difficulty
- 26.2%
Progression profile
Progressive-pass rate
13.8%
Pressure-pass rate
11.3%
Average forward distance
-1.0 m
Positive forward distance / 100
441.3 m
Final-third entries / 100
7.5
Campos visualization
Pass map
Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.
Showing 1–80 of 80 passes
CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
- Pass difficulty
- 99.3%
- Outcome
- Completed
- Attacking impact
- -0.0024
- Value before
- 0.0127
- Value after
- 0.0103
- Length
- 14.0 m
- Context
- Standard
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.
Similar playing styles
Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.
100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.
Limited sample: this player's style profile is based on 2 observed matches, so nearest-neighbor rankings may be less stable.
Style similarity
81.9 / 100
Expected Completion RateCarry Share Of ActionsProgressive Pass Rate
Sample support: Limited · 2 limiting matches
Observed: 2 vs 2 matches
Style similarity
76.1 / 100