Pass difficulty
87.2%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 70
requires 100 passes
Player profile
Julian Ryerson
Borussia Dortmund · Left Back · DEF
Matches observed2
Pass attempts70
Limited sampleActual completion
91.4%
64 completed passes
Pass difficulty
87.2%
How difficult a pass was to complete.
Actual vs. expected passing
+4.2 pp
+2.9 completions vs model expectation
Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.
Player intelligence
Position profile
DEF context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.
Insufficient eligible position metrics for a meaningful radar.
Style
Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.
Under-pressure pass rate
10.0%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 70
requires 100 passes
Progressive pass rate
7.1%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 70
requires 100 passes
Long-pass rate
12.9%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 70
requires 100 passes
Average forward distance
-0.7 units
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 70
requires 100 passes
Positive forward distance / 100 passes
588.3 units
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 70
requires 100 passes
Final-third entries / 100 passes
0.000
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 70
requires 100 passes
Carry share of actions
46.7%
87th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 122
Progressive carry rate
3.5%
66th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 57
Progressive action rate
4.1%
9th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 122
Under-pressure action rate
22.1%
82nd percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 122
Shots / observed match
1.00 / match
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 2
requires 20 shots
xG / shot
14.0%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 2
requires 20 shots
Performance
Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.
Actual vs. expected passing
+4.2 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 70
requires 100 passes
Under-pressure completion above expected
+6.6 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 13 eligible peers · sample 7
requires 20 pressure passes
Progressive completion above expected
+10.2 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 17 eligible peers · sample 5
requires 20 progressive passes
Long-pass completion above expected
-2.4 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 21 eligible peers · sample 9
requires 20 long passes
Goals above expected
0.719
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 2
requires 20 shots
Overall impact / 100 actions
0.056
80th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 122
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.034
51st percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 65
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Carrying impact / 100 carries
0.158
86th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 57
Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
0.044
72nd percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 122
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
0.063
89th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 122
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Playing style
Safe Circulator
Position-relative style among eligible DEF players.
Style separation0.650
Progressive-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty (higher)
Positive forward distance / 100 passes (lower)
Long-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty+0.59 z
Under-pressure pass rate-0.42 z
Progressive-pass rate-1.25 z
Long-pass rate-0.46 z
Positive forward distance / 100 passes-1.19 z
Carry share of actions+0.99 z
Bars are z-scores relative to eligible positional peers, not percentiles or ratings. Distance-based style separation, not a probability. Smaller values mean the player lies nearer the boundary between the two archetypes.
Leverkusen Role Fit
DEF role
How closely a player's playing style matches this role. Compared with Bayer Leverkusen's observed DEF role.
Role distance · lower is closer0.373
CloserFarther
Strongest alignment
- Expected Completion Rate
- Carry Share Of Actions
- Pressure Pass Rate
Largest difference
Progressive Pass Rate
limited sampleObserved across 2 matchesRole: 34 matches · 9 contributors
Role Fit measures how closely a player's observed playing style resembles Bayer Leverkusen's observed positional-role style. It does not predict transfer success or future performance.
Expected Goals
Non-penalty shooting
Goals above expected is descriptive for this observed sample, not a definitive finishing-skill rating.
Shots
2
2 matches observed
Goals
1
Total xG
0.3
Goals above expected
+0.7
xG / shot
0.1
50.0% goals / shot
Limited sample: fewer than 20 non-penalty shots.
Campos visualization
Shot map
Non-penalty xG is encoded by marker size and color. Preserved penalties have no modeled xG.
Shots2
Goals1
xG0.28
xG0.00 – 1.00
Green outline = GoalNormal outline = Non-goal
Attacking impact
Impact of passes and carries
Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.
Overall impact / 100 actions
+0.056
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.034
Carrying impact / 100 carries
+0.158
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
+0.044
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
+0.063
122 actions · 65 passes · 57 carries · 46.7% increased attacking value
Campos visualization
Carry value map
Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.
Situational execution
Under pressure
7 attempts
- Actual
- 85.7%
- Pass difficulty
- 79.1%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- +6.6 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Progressive passing
5 attempts
- Actual
- 40.0%
- Pass difficulty
- 29.8%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- +10.2 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Long passing
9 attempts
- Actual
- 66.7%
- Pass difficulty
- 69.1%
Progression profile
Progressive-pass rate
7.1%
Pressure-pass rate
10.0%
Average forward distance
-0.7 m
Positive forward distance / 100
588.3 m
Final-third entries / 100
0.0
Campos visualization
Pass map
Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.
Showing 1–70 of 70 passes
CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
- Pass difficulty
- 96.3%
- Outcome
- Completed
- Attacking impact
- -0.0002
- Value before
- 0.0155
- Value after
- 0.0153
- Length
- 14.7 m
- Context
- Standard
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.
Similar playing styles
Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.
100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.
Limited sample: this player's style profile is based on 2 observed matches, so nearest-neighbor rankings may be less stable.
Style similarity
82.8 / 100
Expected Completion RateLong Pass RateCarry Share Of Actions
Sample support: Limited · 2 limiting matches
Observed: 2 vs 20 matches
Style similarity
81.7 / 100