Pass difficulty
90.0%
82nd percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 1423
Player profile
Piero Martín Hincapié Reyna
Bayer Leverkusen · Left Center Back · DEF
Matches observed25
Pass attempts1,423
Reliable sampleActual completion
92.3%
1,314 completed passes
Pass difficulty
90.0%
How difficult a pass was to complete.
Actual vs. expected passing
+2.3 pp
+32.9 completions vs model expectation
Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.
Player intelligence
Position profile
DEF context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.
Style
Performance
0–100 empirical percentiles among eligible same-position peers.
Style
Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.
Under-pressure pass rate
9.9%
27th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 1423
Progressive pass rate
7.7%
14th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 1423
Long-pass rate
9.6%
14th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 1423
Average forward distance
4.8 units
45th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 1423
Positive forward distance / 100 passes
744.8 units
45th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 1423
Final-third entries / 100 passes
8.433
55th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 1423
Carry share of actions
45.7%
73rd percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 2551
Progressive carry rate
2.4%
50th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 1165
Progressive action rate
5.2%
16th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 2551
Under-pressure action rate
10.8%
23rd percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 2551
Shots / observed match
0.72 / match
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 18
requires 20 shots
xG / shot
12.3%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 18
requires 20 shots
Performance
Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.
Actual vs. expected passing
+2.3 pp
86th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 1423
Under-pressure completion above expected
+4.4 pp
75th percentile among DEF players
n = 13 eligible peers · sample 141
Progressive completion above expected
+5.3 pp
63rd percentile among DEF players
n = 17 eligible peers · sample 110
Long-pass completion above expected
+4.1 pp
90th percentile among DEF players
n = 21 eligible peers · sample 136
Goals above expected
-1.212
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 18
requires 20 shots
Overall impact / 100 actions
0.027
60th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 2551
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.007
63rd percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 1386
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Carrying impact / 100 carries
0.067
58th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 1165
Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
-0.001
46th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 2551
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
0.020
57th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 2551
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Playing style
Safe Circulator
Position-relative style among eligible DEF players.
Style separation0.694
Progressive-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty (higher)
Positive forward distance / 100 passes (lower)
Long-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty+1.07 z
Under-pressure pass rate-0.43 z
Progressive-pass rate-1.17 z
Long-pass rate-0.95 z
Positive forward distance / 100 passes-0.55 z
Carry share of actions+0.61 z
Bars are z-scores relative to eligible positional peers, not percentiles or ratings. Distance-based style separation, not a probability. Smaller values mean the player lies nearer the boundary between the two archetypes.
Role Fit
DEF role
How closely a player's playing style matches this role. Compared with the observed role of Leverkusen's other DEF contributors.
#3 of 9Comparable current-team defensive profilesRaw distance: 0.412
Lower distance means closer stylistic resemblance.
Closest stylistic dimensions
- Long-pass rate
- Carry involvement
- Forward distance per 100 passes
Largest stylistic difference
Progressive passing rate
higher sampleObserved across 25 matchesRole: 34 matches · 8 contributors
Role Fit compares observed playing style. It does not predict player quality, transfer success, or future performance.
Expected Goals
Non-penalty shooting
Goals above expected is descriptive for this observed sample, not a definitive finishing-skill rating.
Shots
18
13 matches observed
Goals
1
Total xG
2.2
Goals above expected
-1.2
xG / shot
0.1
5.6% goals / shot
Limited sample: fewer than 20 non-penalty shots.
Campos visualization
Shot map
Non-penalty xG is encoded by marker size and color. Preserved penalties have no modeled xG.
Shots18
Goals1
xG2.21
xG0.00 – 1.00
Foot
Header
Corner
Green outline = GoalNormal outline = Non-goal
Attacking impact
Impact of passes and carries
Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.
Overall impact / 100 actions
+0.027
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.007
Carrying impact / 100 carries
+0.067
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
-0.001
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
+0.020
2,551 actions · 1,386 passes · 1,165 carries · 58.7% increased attacking value
Campos visualization
Carry value map
Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.
Situational execution
Under pressure
141 attempts
- Actual
- 80.9%
- Pass difficulty
- 76.4%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- +4.4 pp
Progressive passing
110 attempts
- Actual
- 54.5%
- Pass difficulty
- 49.2%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- +5.3 pp
Long passing
136 attempts
- Actual
- 70.6%
- Pass difficulty
- 66.5%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- +4.1 pp
Progression profile
Progressive-pass rate
7.7%
Pressure-pass rate
9.9%
Average forward distance
4.8 m
Positive forward distance / 100
744.8 m
Final-third entries / 100
8.4
Campos visualization
Pass map
Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.
Showing 1–200 of 1,423 passes
CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
- Pass difficulty
- 97.4%
- Outcome
- Completed
- Attacking impact
- 0.0010
- Value before
- 0.0171
- Value after
- 0.0181
- Length
- 13.8 m
- Context
- Standard
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.
Similar playing styles
Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.
100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.
Style similarity
91.2 / 100
Positive Forward Distance Per 100 PassesExpected Completion RatePressure Pass Rate
Sample support: Higher · 21 limiting matches
Observed: 25 vs 21 matches
Style similarity
90.6 / 100
Carry Share Of ActionsPositive Forward Distance Per 100 Passes