Pass difficulty
89.5%
64th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 1422
Player profile
Odilon Kossonou
Bayer Leverkusen · Right Center Back · DEF
Matches observed21
Pass attempts1,422
Reliable sampleActual completion
90.6%
1,288 completed passes
Pass difficulty
89.5%
How difficult a pass was to complete.
Actual vs. expected passing
+1.1 pp
+16.0 completions vs model expectation
Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.
Player intelligence
Position profile
DEF context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.
Style
Performance
0–100 empirical percentiles among eligible same-position peers.
Style
Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.
Under-pressure pass rate
10.5%
45th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 1422
Progressive pass rate
9.8%
23rd percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 1422
Long-pass rate
10.6%
18th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 1422
Average forward distance
4.2 units
41st percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 1422
Positive forward distance / 100 passes
744.4 units
41st percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 1422
Final-third entries / 100 passes
11.603
86th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 1422
Carry share of actions
46.3%
84th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 2591
Progressive carry rate
3.8%
69th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 1199
Progressive action rate
6.8%
32nd percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 2591
Under-pressure action rate
14.9%
45th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 2591
Shots / observed match
0.24 / match
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 5
requires 20 shots
xG / shot
7.4%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 5
requires 20 shots
Performance
Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.
Actual vs. expected passing
+1.1 pp
59th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 1422
Under-pressure completion above expected
-1.0 pp
17th percentile among DEF players
n = 13 eligible peers · sample 150
Progressive completion above expected
-1.0 pp
25th percentile among DEF players
n = 17 eligible peers · sample 139
Long-pass completion above expected
-3.0 pp
40th percentile among DEF players
n = 21 eligible peers · sample 151
Goals above expected
0.628
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 5
requires 20 shots
Overall impact / 100 actions
0.041
73rd percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 2591
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Passing impact / 100 passes
0.009
71st percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 1392
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Carrying impact / 100 carries
0.078
65th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 1199
Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
0.022
66th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 2591
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
0.031
73rd percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 2591
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Playing style
Safe Circulator
Position-relative style among eligible DEF players.
Style separation0.736
Progressive-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty (higher)
Positive forward distance / 100 passes (lower)
Long-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty+0.97 z
Under-pressure pass rate-0.32 z
Progressive-pass rate-0.89 z
Long-pass rate-0.80 z
Positive forward distance / 100 passes-0.55 z
Carry share of actions+0.83 z
Bars are z-scores relative to eligible positional peers, not percentiles or ratings. Distance-based style separation, not a probability. Smaller values mean the player lies nearer the boundary between the two archetypes.
Role Fit
DEF role
How closely a player's playing style matches this role. Compared with the observed role of Leverkusen's other DEF contributors.
#2 of 9Comparable current-team defensive profilesRaw distance: 0.280
Lower distance means closer stylistic resemblance.
Closest stylistic dimensions
- Long-pass rate
- Carry involvement
- Passes under pressure
Largest stylistic difference
Expected completion rate
higher sampleObserved across 21 matchesRole: 34 matches · 8 contributors
Role Fit compares observed playing style. It does not predict player quality, transfer success, or future performance.
Expected Goals
Non-penalty shooting
Goals above expected is descriptive for this observed sample, not a definitive finishing-skill rating.
Shots
5
5 matches observed
Goals
1
Total xG
0.4
Goals above expected
+0.6
xG / shot
0.1
20.0% goals / shot
Limited sample: fewer than 20 non-penalty shots.
Campos visualization
Shot map
Non-penalty xG is encoded by marker size and color. Preserved penalties have no modeled xG.
Shots5
Goals1
xG0.37
xG0.00 – 1.00
Foot
Corner
Green outline = GoalNormal outline = Non-goal
Attacking impact
Impact of passes and carries
Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.
Overall impact / 100 actions
+0.041
Passing impact / 100 passes
+0.009
Carrying impact / 100 carries
+0.078
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
+0.022
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
+0.031
2,591 actions · 1,392 passes · 1,199 carries · 57.4% increased attacking value
Campos visualization
Carry value map
Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.
Situational execution
Under pressure
150 attempts
- Actual
- 81.3%
- Pass difficulty
- 82.4%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -1.0 pp
Progressive passing
139 attempts
- Actual
- 58.3%
- Pass difficulty
- 59.3%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -1.0 pp
Long passing
151 attempts
- Actual
- 73.5%
- Pass difficulty
- 76.5%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -3.0 pp
Progression profile
Progressive-pass rate
9.8%
Pressure-pass rate
10.5%
Average forward distance
4.2 m
Positive forward distance / 100
744.4 m
Final-third entries / 100
11.6
Campos visualization
Pass map
Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.
Showing 1–200 of 1,422 passes
CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
- Pass difficulty
- 93.1%
- Outcome
- Incomplete
- Attacking impact
- —
- Value before
- —
- Value after
- —
- Length
- 13.1 m
- Context
- Standard
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.
Similar playing styles
Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.
100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.
Style similarity
91.2 / 100
Positive Forward Distance Per 100 PassesExpected Completion RatePressure Pass Rate
Sample support: Higher · 21 limiting matches
Observed: 21 vs 25 matches
Style similarity
86.5 / 100
Carry Share Of Actions