Pass difficulty
86.1%
36th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 127
Player profile
Lucas Silva Melo
Eintracht Frankfurt · Right Back · DEF
Matches observed2
Pass attempts127
Reliable sampleActual completion
87.4%
111 completed passes
Pass difficulty
86.1%
How difficult a pass was to complete.
Actual vs. expected passing
+1.3 pp
+1.6 completions vs model expectation
Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.
Player intelligence
Position profile
DEF context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.
Style
Performance
0–100 empirical percentiles among eligible same-position peers.
Style
Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.
Under-pressure pass rate
14.2%
82nd percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 127
Progressive pass rate
11.8%
50th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 127
Long-pass rate
13.4%
50th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 127
Average forward distance
2.3 units
32nd percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 127
Positive forward distance / 100 passes
724.6 units
36th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 127
Final-third entries / 100 passes
9.449
59th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 127
Carry share of actions
46.1%
78th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 230
Progressive carry rate
0.0%
16th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 106
Progressive action rate
5.7%
19th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 230
Under-pressure action rate
19.1%
69th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 230
Shots / observed match
0.50 / match
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 1
requires 20 shots
xG / shot
8.6%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 1
requires 20 shots
Performance
Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.
Actual vs. expected passing
+1.3 pp
64th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 127
Under-pressure completion above expected
+3.3 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 13 eligible peers · sample 18
requires 20 pressure passes
Progressive completion above expected
-9.2 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 17 eligible peers · sample 15
requires 20 progressive passes
Long-pass completion above expected
-7.4 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 21 eligible peers · sample 17
requires 20 long passes
Goals above expected
-0.086
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 1
requires 20 shots
Overall impact / 100 actions
-0.051
12th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 230
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.113
24th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 124
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Carrying impact / 100 carries
0.020
8th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 106
Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
-0.039
17th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 230
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
0.008
31st percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 230
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Playing style
Safe Circulator
Position-relative style among eligible DEF players.
Style separation0.813
Progressive-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty (higher)
Positive forward distance / 100 passes (lower)
Long-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty+0.40 z
Under-pressure pass rate+0.34 z
Progressive-pass rate-0.61 z
Long-pass rate-0.38 z
Positive forward distance / 100 passes-0.63 z
Carry share of actions+0.76 z
Bars are z-scores relative to eligible positional peers, not percentiles or ratings. Distance-based style separation, not a probability. Smaller values mean the player lies nearer the boundary between the two archetypes.
Leverkusen Role Fit
DEF role
How closely a player's playing style matches this role. Compared with Bayer Leverkusen's observed DEF role.
Role distance · lower is closer0.289
CloserFarther
Strongest alignment
- Carry Share Of Actions
- Progressive Pass Rate
- Expected Completion Rate
Largest difference
Long Pass Rate
limited sampleObserved across 2 matchesRole: 34 matches · 9 contributors
Role Fit measures how closely a player's observed playing style resembles Bayer Leverkusen's observed positional-role style. It does not predict transfer success or future performance.
Expected Goals
Non-penalty shooting
Goals above expected is descriptive for this observed sample, not a definitive finishing-skill rating.
Shots
1
1 matches observed
Goals
0
Total xG
0.1
Goals above expected
-0.1
xG / shot
0.1
0.0% goals / shot
Limited sample: fewer than 20 non-penalty shots.
Campos visualization
Shot map
Non-penalty xG is encoded by marker size and color. Preserved penalties have no modeled xG.
Shots1
Goals0
xG0.09
xG0.00 – 1.00
Green outline = GoalNormal outline = Non-goal
Attacking impact
Impact of passes and carries
Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.
Overall impact / 100 actions
-0.051
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.113
Carrying impact / 100 carries
+0.020
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
-0.039
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
+0.008
230 actions · 124 passes · 106 carries · 49.6% increased attacking value
Campos visualization
Carry value map
Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.
Situational execution
Under pressure
18 attempts
- Actual
- 72.2%
- Pass difficulty
- 69.0%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- +3.3 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Progressive passing
15 attempts
- Actual
- 33.3%
- Pass difficulty
- 42.5%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -9.2 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Long passing
17 attempts
- Actual
- 64.7%
- Pass difficulty
- 72.1%
Progression profile
Progressive-pass rate
11.8%
Pressure-pass rate
14.2%
Average forward distance
2.3 m
Positive forward distance / 100
724.6 m
Final-third entries / 100
9.4
Campos visualization
Pass map
Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.
Showing 1–127 of 127 passes
CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
- Pass difficulty
- 99.6%
- Outcome
- Completed
- Attacking impact
- 0.0001
- Value before
- 0.0067
- Value after
- 0.0068
- Length
- 11.3 m
- Context
- Standard
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.
Similar playing styles
Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.
100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.
Limited sample: this player's style profile is based on 2 observed matches, so nearest-neighbor rankings may be less stable.
Style similarity
90.0 / 100
Carry Share Of ActionsProgressive Pass RatePositive Forward Distance Per 100 Passes
Sample support: Limited · 2 limiting matches
Observed: 2 vs 20 matches
Style similarity
80.1 / 100