Pass difficulty
90.8%
86th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 117
Player profile
Robin Koch
Eintracht Frankfurt · Right Center Back · DEF
Matches observed2
Pass attempts117
Reliable sampleActual completion
89.7%
105 completed passes
Pass difficulty
90.8%
How difficult a pass was to complete.
Actual vs. expected passing
-1.0 pp
-1.2 completions vs model expectation
Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.
Player intelligence
Position profile
DEF context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.
Style
Performance
0–100 empirical percentiles among eligible same-position peers.
Style
Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.
Under-pressure pass rate
17.1%
91st percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 117
Progressive pass rate
8.5%
18th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 117
Long-pass rate
15.4%
59th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 117
Average forward distance
5.3 units
50th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 117
Positive forward distance / 100 passes
778.7 units
55th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 117
Final-third entries / 100 passes
5.983
23rd percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 117
Carry share of actions
46.7%
86th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 210
Progressive carry rate
0.0%
16th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 98
Progressive action rate
3.8%
8th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 210
Under-pressure action rate
16.7%
53rd percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 210
Shots / observed match
0.00 / match
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 0
requires 20 shots
xG / shot
—
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 0
metric unavailable
Performance
Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.
Actual vs. expected passing
-1.0 pp
18th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 117
Under-pressure completion above expected
+3.7 pp
67th percentile among DEF players
n = 13 eligible peers · sample 20
Progressive completion above expected
-25.8 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 17 eligible peers · sample 10
requires 20 progressive passes
Long-pass completion above expected
-15.5 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 21 eligible peers · sample 18
requires 20 long passes
Goals above expected
0.000
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 0
requires 20 shots
Overall impact / 100 actions
-0.009
30th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 210
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.062
34th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 112
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Carrying impact / 100 carries
0.053
38th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 98
Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
-0.043
12th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 210
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
0.032
75th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 210
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Playing style
Safe Circulator
Position-relative style among eligible DEF players.
Style separation0.617
Progressive-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty (higher)
Positive forward distance / 100 passes (lower)
Long-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty+1.19 z
Under-pressure pass rate+0.87 z
Progressive-pass rate-1.06 z
Long-pass rate-0.08 z
Positive forward distance / 100 passes-0.41 z
Carry share of actions+0.97 z
Bars are z-scores relative to eligible positional peers, not percentiles or ratings. Distance-based style separation, not a probability. Smaller values mean the player lies nearer the boundary between the two archetypes.
Leverkusen Role Fit
DEF role
How closely a player's playing style matches this role. Compared with Bayer Leverkusen's observed DEF role.
Role distance · lower is closer0.624
CloserFarther
Strongest alignment
- Carry Share Of Actions
- Positive Forward Distance Per 100 Passes
- Progressive Pass Rate
Largest difference
Pressure Pass Rate
limited sampleObserved across 2 matchesRole: 34 matches · 9 contributors
Role Fit measures how closely a player's observed playing style resembles Bayer Leverkusen's observed positional-role style. It does not predict transfer success or future performance.
Attacking impact
Impact of passes and carries
Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.
Overall impact / 100 actions
-0.009
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.062
Carrying impact / 100 carries
+0.053
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
-0.043
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
+0.032
210 actions · 112 passes · 98 carries · 58.6% increased attacking value
Campos visualization
Carry value map
Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.
Situational execution
Under pressure
20 attempts
- Actual
- 90.0%
- Pass difficulty
- 86.3%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- +3.7 pp
Progressive passing
10 attempts
- Actual
- 20.0%
- Pass difficulty
- 45.8%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -25.8 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Long passing
18 attempts
- Actual
- 55.6%
- Pass difficulty
- 71.1%
- Actual vs. expected passing
Progression profile
Progressive-pass rate
8.5%
Pressure-pass rate
17.1%
Average forward distance
5.3 m
Positive forward distance / 100
778.7 m
Final-third entries / 100
6.0
Campos visualization
Pass map
Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.
Showing 1–117 of 117 passes
CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
- Pass difficulty
- 98.3%
- Outcome
- Completed
- Attacking impact
- 0.0034
- Value before
- 0.0050
- Value after
- 0.0084
- Length
- 16.5 m
- Context
- Under pressure
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.
Similar playing styles
Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.
100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.
Limited sample: this player's style profile is based on 2 observed matches, so nearest-neighbor rankings may be less stable.
Style similarity
77.8 / 100
Carry Share Of ActionsPositive Forward Distance Per 100 PassesLong Pass Rate
Sample support: Limited · 2 limiting matches
Observed: 2 vs 2 matches
Style similarity
77.0 / 100