Pass difficulty
85.6%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 59
requires 100 passes
Player profile
Julián Malatini
Werder Bremen · Right Center Back · DEF
Matches observed1
Pass attempts59
Limited sampleActual completion
79.7%
47 completed passes
Pass difficulty
85.6%
How difficult a pass was to complete.
Actual vs. expected passing
-6.0 pp
-3.5 completions vs model expectation
Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.
Player intelligence
Position profile
DEF context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.
Insufficient eligible position metrics for a meaningful radar.
Style
Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.
Under-pressure pass rate
20.3%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 59
requires 100 passes
Progressive pass rate
13.6%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 59
requires 100 passes
Long-pass rate
20.3%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 59
requires 100 passes
Average forward distance
3.5 units
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 59
requires 100 passes
Positive forward distance / 100 passes
812.4 units
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 59
requires 100 passes
Final-third entries / 100 passes
10.169
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 59
requires 100 passes
Carry share of actions
46.2%
81st percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 104
Progressive carry rate
0.0%
16th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 48
Progressive action rate
5.8%
22nd percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 104
Under-pressure action rate
26.0%
94th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 104
Shots / observed match
1.00 / match
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 1
requires 20 shots
xG / shot
3.4%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 1
requires 20 shots
Performance
Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.
Actual vs. expected passing
-6.0 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 59
requires 100 passes
Under-pressure completion above expected
-22.7 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 13 eligible peers · sample 12
requires 20 pressure passes
Progressive completion above expected
-23.4 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 17 eligible peers · sample 8
requires 20 progressive passes
Long-pass completion above expected
-12.5 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 21 eligible peers · sample 12
requires 20 long passes
Goals above expected
-0.034
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 1
requires 20 shots
Overall impact / 100 actions
0.001
37th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 104
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.060
38th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 56
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Carrying impact / 100 carries
0.072
59th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 48
Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
-0.013
35th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 104
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
-0.012
10th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 104
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Playing style
Safe Circulator
Position-relative style among eligible DEF players.
Style separation0.305
Progressive-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty (higher)
Positive forward distance / 100 passes (lower)
Long-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty+0.31 z
Under-pressure pass rate+1.46 z
Progressive-pass rate-0.37 z
Long-pass rate+0.66 z
Positive forward distance / 100 passes-0.27 z
Carry share of actions+0.79 z
Bars are z-scores relative to eligible positional peers, not percentiles or ratings. Distance-based style separation, not a probability. Smaller values mean the player lies nearer the boundary between the two archetypes.
Leverkusen Role Fit
DEF role
How closely a player's playing style matches this role. Compared with Bayer Leverkusen's observed DEF role.
Role distance · lower is closer0.929
CloserFarther
Strongest alignment
- Carry Share Of Actions
- Progressive Pass Rate
- Expected Completion Rate
Largest difference
Pressure Pass Rate
limited sampleObserved across 1 matchesRole: 34 matches · 9 contributors
Role Fit measures how closely a player's observed playing style resembles Bayer Leverkusen's observed positional-role style. It does not predict transfer success or future performance.
Expected Goals
Non-penalty shooting
Goals above expected is descriptive for this observed sample, not a definitive finishing-skill rating.
Shots
1
1 matches observed
Goals
0
Total xG
0.0
Goals above expected
-0.0
xG / shot
0.0
0.0% goals / shot
Limited sample: fewer than 20 non-penalty shots.
Campos visualization
Shot map
Non-penalty xG is encoded by marker size and color. Preserved penalties have no modeled xG.
Shots1
Goals0
xG0.03
xG0.00 – 1.00
Green outline = GoalNormal outline = Non-goal
Attacking impact
Impact of passes and carries
Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.
Overall impact / 100 actions
+0.001
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.060
Carrying impact / 100 carries
+0.072
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
-0.013
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
-0.012
104 actions · 56 passes · 48 carries · 54.8% increased attacking value
Campos visualization
Carry value map
Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.
Situational execution
Under pressure
12 attempts
- Actual
- 33.3%
- Pass difficulty
- 56.1%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -22.7 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Progressive passing
8 attempts
- Actual
- 25.0%
- Pass difficulty
- 48.4%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -23.4 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Long passing
12 attempts
- Actual
- 58.3%
- Pass difficulty
- 70.8%
Progression profile
Progressive-pass rate
13.6%
Pressure-pass rate
20.3%
Average forward distance
3.5 m
Positive forward distance / 100
812.4 m
Final-third entries / 100
10.2
Campos visualization
Pass map
Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.
Showing 1–59 of 59 passes
CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
- Pass difficulty
- 98.2%
- Outcome
- Completed
- Attacking impact
- 0.0003
- Value before
- 0.0051
- Value after
- 0.0054
- Length
- 17.2 m
- Context
- Standard
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.
Similar playing styles
Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.
100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.
Limited sample: this player's style profile is based on 1 observed match, so nearest-neighbor rankings may be less stable.
Style similarity
78.7 / 100
Expected Completion RateProgressive Pass RateLong Pass Rate
Sample support: Limited · 1 limiting matches
Observed: 1 vs 2 matches
Style similarity
77.9 / 100