Pass difficulty
85.0%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 83
requires 100 passes
Player profile
Dominik Kohr
FSV Mainz 05 · Right Center Back · DEF
Matches observed2
Pass attempts83
Limited sampleActual completion
80.7%
67 completed passes
Pass difficulty
85.0%
How difficult a pass was to complete.
Actual vs. expected passing
-4.3 pp
-3.6 completions vs model expectation
Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.
Player intelligence
Position profile
DEF context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.
Insufficient eligible position metrics for a meaningful radar.
Style
Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.
Under-pressure pass rate
18.1%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 83
requires 100 passes
Progressive pass rate
14.5%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 83
requires 100 passes
Long-pass rate
19.3%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 83
requires 100 passes
Average forward distance
3.7 units
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 83
requires 100 passes
Positive forward distance / 100 passes
855.7 units
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 83
requires 100 passes
Final-third entries / 100 passes
13.253
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 83
requires 100 passes
Carry share of actions
43.5%
37th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 138
Progressive carry rate
1.7%
42nd percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 60
Progressive action rate
8.0%
40th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 138
Under-pressure action rate
18.8%
67th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 138
Shots / observed match
1.50 / match
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 3
requires 20 shots
xG / shot
11.2%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 3
requires 20 shots
Performance
Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.
Actual vs. expected passing
-4.3 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 83
requires 100 passes
Under-pressure completion above expected
+3.5 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 13 eligible peers · sample 15
requires 20 pressure passes
Progressive completion above expected
-23.6 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 17 eligible peers · sample 12
requires 20 progressive passes
Long-pass completion above expected
-17.6 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 21 eligible peers · sample 16
requires 20 long passes
Goals above expected
0.665
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 3
requires 20 shots
Overall impact / 100 actions
-0.087
9th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 138
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.196
15th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 78
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Carrying impact / 100 carries
0.054
42nd percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 60
Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
-0.066
6th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 138
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
0.035
78th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 138
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Playing style
Safe Circulator
Position-relative style among eligible DEF players.
Style separation0.185
Progressive-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty (higher)
Positive forward distance / 100 passes (lower)
Long-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty+0.20 z
Under-pressure pass rate+1.05 z
Progressive-pass rate-0.24 z
Long-pass rate+0.50 z
Positive forward distance / 100 passes-0.09 z
Carry share of actions-0.17 z
Bars are z-scores relative to eligible positional peers, not percentiles or ratings. Distance-based style separation, not a probability. Smaller values mean the player lies nearer the boundary between the two archetypes.
Leverkusen Role Fit
DEF role
How closely a player's playing style matches this role. Compared with Bayer Leverkusen's observed DEF role.
Role distance · lower is closer0.903
CloserFarther
Strongest alignment
- Progressive Pass Rate
- Expected Completion Rate
- Positive Forward Distance Per 100 Passes
Largest difference
Long Pass Rate
limited sampleObserved across 2 matchesRole: 34 matches · 9 contributors
Role Fit measures how closely a player's observed playing style resembles Bayer Leverkusen's observed positional-role style. It does not predict transfer success or future performance.
Expected Goals
Non-penalty shooting
Goals above expected is descriptive for this observed sample, not a definitive finishing-skill rating.
Shots
3
2 matches observed
Goals
1
Total xG
0.3
Goals above expected
+0.7
xG / shot
0.1
33.3% goals / shot
Limited sample: fewer than 20 non-penalty shots.
Campos visualization
Shot map
Non-penalty xG is encoded by marker size and color. Preserved penalties have no modeled xG.
Shots3
Goals1
xG0.34
xG0.00 – 1.00
Header
Corner
Green outline = GoalNormal outline = Non-goal
Attacking impact
Impact of passes and carries
Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.
Overall impact / 100 actions
-0.087
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.196
Carrying impact / 100 carries
+0.054
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
-0.066
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
+0.035
138 actions · 78 passes · 60 carries · 39.9% increased attacking value
Campos visualization
Carry value map
Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.
Situational execution
Under pressure
15 attempts
- Actual
- 80.0%
- Pass difficulty
- 76.5%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- +3.5 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Progressive passing
12 attempts
- Actual
- 16.7%
- Pass difficulty
- 40.3%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -23.6 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Long passing
16 attempts
- Actual
- 37.5%
- Pass difficulty
- 55.1%
Progression profile
Progressive-pass rate
14.5%
Pressure-pass rate
18.1%
Average forward distance
3.7 m
Positive forward distance / 100
855.7 m
Final-third entries / 100
13.3
Campos visualization
Pass map
Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.
Showing 1–83 of 83 passes
CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
- Pass difficulty
- 99.6%
- Outcome
- Completed
- Attacking impact
- 0.0001
- Value before
- 0.0052
- Value after
- 0.0053
- Length
- 12.2 m
- Context
- Standard
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.
Similar playing styles
Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.
100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.
Limited sample: this player's style profile is based on 2 observed matches, so nearest-neighbor rankings may be less stable.
Style similarity
78.7 / 100
Expected Completion RateProgressive Pass RateLong Pass Rate
Sample support: Limited · 1 limiting matches
Observed: 2 vs 1 matches
Style similarity
77.1 / 100