Pass difficulty
80.7%
9th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 1038
Player profile
Jeremie Frimpong
Bayer Leverkusen · Right Wing Back · DEF
Matches observed31
Pass attempts1,038
Reliable sampleActual completion
79.1%
821 completed passes
Pass difficulty
80.7%
How difficult a pass was to complete.
Actual vs. expected passing
-1.6 pp
-16.8 completions vs model expectation
Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.
Player intelligence
Position profile
DEF context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.
Style
Performance
0–100 empirical percentiles among eligible same-position peers.
Style
Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.
Under-pressure pass rate
14.3%
86th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 1038
Progressive pass rate
17.6%
86th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 1038
Long-pass rate
6.9%
0th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 1038
Average forward distance
-2.3 units
5th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 1038
Positive forward distance / 100 passes
324.2 units
0th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 1038
Final-third entries / 100 passes
3.468
0th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 1038
Carry share of actions
49.9%
99th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 1998
Progressive carry rate
19.2%
100th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 997
Progressive action rate
18.3%
90th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 1998
Under-pressure action rate
26.0%
95th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 1998
Shots / observed match
1.81 / match
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 56
requires 10 eligible position peers
xG / shot
12.7%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 56
requires 10 eligible position peers
Performance
Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.
Actual vs. expected passing
-1.6 pp
14th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 1038
Under-pressure completion above expected
+0.1 pp
33rd percentile among DEF players
n = 13 eligible peers · sample 148
Progressive completion above expected
-1.1 pp
19th percentile among DEF players
n = 17 eligible peers · sample 183
Long-pass completion above expected
-1.1 pp
60th percentile among DEF players
n = 21 eligible peers · sample 72
Goals above expected
1.868
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 56
requires 10 eligible position peers
Overall impact / 100 actions
0.071
88th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 1998
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.241
10th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 1001
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Carrying impact / 100 carries
0.385
100th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 997
Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
0.146
90th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 1998
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
0.101
98th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 1998
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Playing style
Safe Circulator
Position-relative style among eligible DEF players.
Style separation0.338
Progressive-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty (higher)
Positive forward distance / 100 passes (lower)
Long-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty-0.54 z
Under-pressure pass rate+0.36 z
Progressive-pass rate+0.19 z
Long-pass rate-1.35 z
Positive forward distance / 100 passes-2.28 z
Carry share of actions+2.13 z
Bars are z-scores relative to eligible positional peers, not percentiles or ratings. Distance-based style separation, not a probability. Smaller values mean the player lies nearer the boundary between the two archetypes.
Role Fit
DEF role
How closely a player's playing style matches this role. Compared with the observed role of Leverkusen's other DEF contributors.
#8 of 9Comparable current-team defensive profilesRaw distance: 1.126
Lower distance means closer stylistic resemblance.
Closest stylistic dimensions
- Passes under pressure
- Long-pass rate
- Progressive passing rate
Largest stylistic difference
Forward distance per 100 passes
higher sampleObserved across 31 matchesRole: 34 matches · 8 contributors
Role Fit compares observed playing style. It does not predict player quality, transfer success, or future performance.
Expected Goals
Non-penalty shooting
Goals above expected is descriptive for this observed sample, not a definitive finishing-skill rating.
Shots
56
28 matches observed
Goals
9
Total xG
7.1
Goals above expected
+1.9
xG / shot
0.1
16.1% goals / shot
Campos visualization
Shot map
Non-penalty xG is encoded by marker size and color. Preserved penalties have no modeled xG.
Shots56
Goals9
xG7.13
xG0.00 – 1.00
Foot
Header
Corner
Other
Green outline = GoalNormal outline = Non-goal
Attacking impact
Impact of passes and carries
Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.
Overall impact / 100 actions
+0.071
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.241
Carrying impact / 100 carries
+0.385
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
+0.146
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
+0.101
1,998 actions · 1,001 passes · 997 carries · 56.3% increased attacking value
Campos visualization
Carry value map
Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.
Situational execution
Under pressure
148 attempts
- Actual
- 68.2%
- Pass difficulty
- 68.2%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- +0.1 pp
Progressive passing
183 attempts
- Actual
- 44.8%
- Pass difficulty
- 45.9%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -1.1 pp
Long passing
72 attempts
- Actual
- 54.2%
- Pass difficulty
- 55.2%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -1.1 pp
Progression profile
Progressive-pass rate
17.6%
Pressure-pass rate
14.3%
Average forward distance
-2.3 m
Positive forward distance / 100
324.2 m
Final-third entries / 100
3.5
Campos visualization
Pass map
Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.
Showing 1–200 of 1,038 passes
CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
- Pass difficulty
- 11.1%
- Outcome
- Incomplete
- Attacking impact
- -0.0099
- Value before
- 0.0099
- Value after
- 0.0000
- Length
- 34.6 m
- Context
- Progressive · Under pressure
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.
Similar playing styles
Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.
100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.
Style similarity
84.9 / 100
Progressive Pass RateLong Pass RateExpected Completion Rate
Sample support: Higher · 24 limiting matches
Observed: 31 vs 24 matches
Style similarity
73.8 / 100
Pressure Pass RateProgressive Pass Rate