Pass difficulty
87.0%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 65
requires 100 passes
Player profile
Serhou Guirassy
VfB Stuttgart · Left Center Forward · FWD
Matches observed2
Pass attempts65
Limited sampleActual completion
84.6%
55 completed passes
Pass difficulty
87.0%
How difficult a pass was to complete.
Actual vs. expected passing
-2.4 pp
-1.6 completions vs model expectation
Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.
Player intelligence
Position profile
FWD context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.
Insufficient eligible position metrics for a meaningful radar.
Style
Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.
Under-pressure pass rate
27.7%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 65
requires 100 passes
Progressive pass rate
3.1%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 65
requires 100 passes
Long-pass rate
4.6%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 65
requires 100 passes
Average forward distance
-2.6 units
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 65
requires 100 passes
Positive forward distance / 100 passes
297.8 units
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 65
requires 100 passes
Final-third entries / 100 passes
1.538
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 65
requires 100 passes
Carry share of actions
45.4%
42nd percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 119
Progressive carry rate
0.0%
0th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 54
Progressive action rate
1.7%
0th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 119
Under-pressure action rate
35.3%
42nd percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 119
Shots / observed match
4.50 / match
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 2 eligible peers · sample 9
requires 20 shots
xG / shot
14.7%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 2 eligible peers · sample 9
requires 20 shots
Performance
Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.
Actual vs. expected passing
-2.4 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 65
requires 100 passes
Under-pressure completion above expected
-12.8 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 18
requires 20 pressure passes
Progressive completion above expected
-41.7 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 2
requires 20 progressive passes
Long-pass completion above expected
-21.0 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 1 eligible peers · sample 3
requires 20 long passes
Goals above expected
-1.322
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 2 eligible peers · sample 9
requires 20 shots
Overall impact / 100 actions
-0.213
21st percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 119
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.427
39th percentile among FWD players
n = 19 eligible peers · sample 65
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Carrying impact / 100 carries
0.045
11th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 54
Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
-0.037
26th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 119
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
-0.022
16th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 119
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Playing style
Safe Circulator
Position-relative style among eligible FWD players.
Style separation0.594
Progressive-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty (higher)
Positive forward distance / 100 passes (lower)
Long-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty+1.61 z
Under-pressure pass rate+0.61 z
Progressive-pass rate-1.53 z
Long-pass rate-0.92 z
Positive forward distance / 100 passes-1.14 z
Carry share of actions-0.09 z
Bars are z-scores relative to eligible positional peers, not percentiles or ratings. Distance-based style separation, not a probability. Smaller values mean the player lies nearer the boundary between the two archetypes.
Leverkusen Role Fit
FWD role
How closely a player's playing style matches this role. Compared with Bayer Leverkusen's observed FWD role.
Role distance · lower is closer0.763
CloserFarther
Strongest alignment
- Pressure Pass Rate
- Long Pass Rate
- Positive Forward Distance Per 100 Passes
Largest difference
Carry Share Of Actions
limited sampleObserved across 2 matchesRole: 33 matches · 3 contributors
Limited contributor diversity: this role profile is based on three contributing forwards across 33 observed matches and is more sensitive to individual-player composition than the DEF and MID profiles.
Role Fit measures how closely a player's observed playing style resembles Bayer Leverkusen's observed positional-role style. It does not predict transfer success or future performance.
Expected Goals
Non-penalty shooting
Goals above expected is descriptive for this observed sample, not a definitive finishing-skill rating.
Shots
9
2 matches observed
Goals
0
Total xG
1.3
Goals above expected
-1.3
xG / shot
0.1
0.0% goals / shot
Limited sample: fewer than 20 non-penalty shots.
Campos visualization
Shot map
Non-penalty xG is encoded by marker size and color. Preserved penalties have no modeled xG.
Shots9
Goals0
xG1.32
xG0.00 – 1.00
Foot
Header
Set piece
Green outline = GoalNormal outline = Non-goal
Attacking impact
Impact of passes and carries
Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.
Overall impact / 100 actions
-0.213
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.427
Carrying impact / 100 carries
+0.045
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
-0.037
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
-0.022
119 actions · 65 passes · 54 carries · 33.6% increased attacking value
Campos visualization
Carry value map
Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.
Situational execution
Under pressure
18 attempts
- Actual
- 66.7%
- Pass difficulty
- 79.4%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -12.8 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Progressive passing
2 attempts
- Actual
- 0.0%
- Pass difficulty
- 41.7%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -41.7 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Long passing
3 attempts
- Actual
- 66.7%
- Pass difficulty
- 87.7%
Progression profile
Progressive-pass rate
3.1%
Pressure-pass rate
27.7%
Average forward distance
-2.6 m
Positive forward distance / 100
297.8 m
Final-third entries / 100
1.5
Campos visualization
Pass map
Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.
Showing 1–65 of 65 passes
CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
- Pass difficulty
- 82.3%
- Outcome
- Completed
- Attacking impact
- -0.0018
- Value before
- 0.0140
- Value after
- 0.0122
- Length
- 4.1 m
- Context
- Standard
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.
Similar playing styles
Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.
100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.
Limited sample: this player's style profile is based on 2 observed matches, so nearest-neighbor rankings may be less stable.
Style similarity
81.2 / 100
Long Pass RateProgressive Pass RatePositive Forward Distance Per 100 Passes
Sample support: Limited · 2 limiting matches
Observed: 2 vs 20 matches
Style similarity
72.4 / 100