Pass difficulty
78.5%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 107
requires 10 eligible position peers
Player profile
Leroy Sané
Bayern Munich · Right Wing · FWD
Matches observed2
Pass attempts107
Reliable sampleActual completion
75.7%
81 completed passes
Pass difficulty
78.5%
How difficult a pass was to complete.
Actual vs. expected passing
-2.8 pp
-3.0 completions vs model expectation
Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.
Player intelligence
Position profile
FWD context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.
Insufficient eligible position metrics for a meaningful radar.
Style
Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.
Under-pressure pass rate
15.0%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 107
requires 10 eligible position peers
Progressive pass rate
22.4%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 107
requires 10 eligible position peers
Long-pass rate
16.8%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 107
requires 10 eligible position peers
Average forward distance
-0.9 units
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 107
requires 10 eligible position peers
Positive forward distance / 100 passes
411.8 units
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 107
requires 10 eligible position peers
Final-third entries / 100 passes
6.542
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 107
requires 10 eligible position peers
Carry share of actions
50.0%
79th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 210
Progressive carry rate
11.4%
79th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 105
Progressive action rate
17.1%
79th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 210
Under-pressure action rate
32.4%
26th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 210
Shots / observed match
1.50 / match
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 2 eligible peers · sample 3
requires 20 shots
xG / shot
6.1%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 2 eligible peers · sample 3
requires 20 shots
Performance
Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.
Actual vs. expected passing
-2.8 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 107
requires 10 eligible position peers
Under-pressure completion above expected
-3.0 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 16
requires 20 pressure passes
Progressive completion above expected
+1.4 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 24
requires 10 eligible position peers
Long-pass completion above expected
-6.5 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 1 eligible peers · sample 18
requires 20 long passes
Goals above expected
-0.182
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 2 eligible peers · sample 3
requires 20 shots
Overall impact / 100 actions
-0.076
53rd percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 210
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.336
50th percentile among FWD players
n = 19 eligible peers · sample 105
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Carrying impact / 100 carries
0.183
47th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 105
Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
0.002
37th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 210
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
0.068
74th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 210
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Playing style
Safe Circulator
Position-relative style among eligible FWD players.
Style separation0.199
Progressive-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty (higher)
Positive forward distance / 100 passes (lower)
Long-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty+0.17 z
Under-pressure pass rate-1.02 z
Progressive-pass rate+0.30 z
Long-pass rate+0.25 z
Positive forward distance / 100 passes-0.65 z
Carry share of actions+0.71 z
Bars are z-scores relative to eligible positional peers, not percentiles or ratings. Distance-based style separation, not a probability. Smaller values mean the player lies nearer the boundary between the two archetypes.
Leverkusen Role Fit
FWD role
How closely a player's playing style matches this role. Compared with Bayer Leverkusen's observed FWD role.
Role distance · lower is closer1.043
CloserFarther
Strongest alignment
- Positive Forward Distance Per 100 Passes
- Expected Completion Rate
- Carry Share Of Actions
Largest difference
Pressure Pass Rate
limited sampleObserved across 2 matchesRole: 33 matches · 3 contributors
Limited contributor diversity: this role profile is based on three contributing forwards across 33 observed matches and is more sensitive to individual-player composition than the DEF and MID profiles.
Role Fit measures how closely a player's observed playing style resembles Bayer Leverkusen's observed positional-role style. It does not predict transfer success or future performance.
Expected Goals
Non-penalty shooting
Goals above expected is descriptive for this observed sample, not a definitive finishing-skill rating.
Shots
3
2 matches observed
Goals
0
Total xG
0.2
Goals above expected
-0.2
xG / shot
0.1
0.0% goals / shot
Limited sample: fewer than 20 non-penalty shots.
Campos visualization
Shot map
Non-penalty xG is encoded by marker size and color. Preserved penalties have no modeled xG.
Shots3
Goals0
xG0.18
xG0.00 – 1.00
Green outline = GoalNormal outline = Non-goal
Attacking impact
Impact of passes and carries
Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.
Overall impact / 100 actions
-0.076
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.336
Carrying impact / 100 carries
+0.183
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
+0.002
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
+0.068
210 actions · 105 passes · 105 carries · 47.6% increased attacking value
Campos visualization
Carry value map
Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.
Situational execution
Under pressure
16 attempts
- Actual
- 75.0%
- Pass difficulty
- 78.0%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -3.0 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Progressive passing
24 attempts
- Actual
- 45.8%
- Pass difficulty
- 44.4%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- +1.4 pp
Long passing
18 attempts
- Actual
- 50.0%
- Pass difficulty
- 56.5%
- Actual vs. expected passing
Progression profile
Progressive-pass rate
22.4%
Pressure-pass rate
15.0%
Average forward distance
-0.9 m
Positive forward distance / 100
411.8 m
Final-third entries / 100
6.5
Campos visualization
Pass map
Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.
Showing 1–107 of 107 passes
CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
- Pass difficulty
- 99.2%
- Outcome
- Completed
- Attacking impact
- -0.0000
- Value before
- 0.0103
- Value after
- 0.0103
- Length
- 16.5 m
- Context
- Standard
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.
Similar playing styles
Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.
100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.
Limited sample: this player's style profile is based on 2 observed matches, so nearest-neighbor rankings may be less stable.
Style similarity
59.8 / 100
Carry Share Of ActionsLong Pass RatePressure Pass Rate
Sample support: Limited · 2 limiting matches
Observed: 2 vs 2 matches
Style similarity
59.0 / 100