Pass difficulty
81.6%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 391
requires 10 eligible position peers
Player profile
Victor Okoh Boniface
Bayer Leverkusen · Center Forward · FWD
Matches observed23
Pass attempts391
Reliable sampleActual completion
73.9%
289 completed passes
Pass difficulty
81.6%
How difficult a pass was to complete.
Actual vs. expected passing
-7.7 pp
-30.1 completions vs model expectation
Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.
Player intelligence
Position profile
FWD context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.
Insufficient eligible position metrics for a meaningful radar.
Style
Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.
Under-pressure pass rate
26.9%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 391
requires 10 eligible position peers
Progressive pass rate
12.0%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 391
requires 10 eligible position peers
Long-pass rate
9.2%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 391
requires 10 eligible position peers
Average forward distance
-0.3 units
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 391
requires 10 eligible position peers
Positive forward distance / 100 passes
437.9 units
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 391
requires 10 eligible position peers
Final-third entries / 100 passes
6.138
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 391
requires 10 eligible position peers
Carry share of actions
57.3%
95th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 887
Progressive carry rate
12.4%
84th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 508
Progressive action rate
12.0%
53rd percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 887
Under-pressure action rate
45.2%
84th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 887
Shots / observed match
3.35 / match
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 2 eligible peers · sample 77
requires 10 eligible position peers
xG / shot
14.0%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 2 eligible peers · sample 77
requires 10 eligible position peers
Performance
Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.
Actual vs. expected passing
-7.7 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 391
requires 10 eligible position peers
Under-pressure completion above expected
-9.9 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 105
requires 10 eligible position peers
Progressive completion above expected
+4.8 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 47
requires 10 eligible position peers
Long-pass completion above expected
-3.7 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 1 eligible peers · sample 36
requires 10 eligible position peers
Goals above expected
-0.798
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 2 eligible peers · sample 77
requires 10 eligible position peers
Overall impact / 100 actions
-0.018
79th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 887
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.588
22nd percentile among FWD players
n = 19 eligible peers · sample 379
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Carrying impact / 100 carries
0.408
95th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 508
Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
0.258
95th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 887
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
0.152
95th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 887
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Playing style
Safe Circulator
Position-relative style among eligible FWD players.
Style separation0.538
Progressive-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty (higher)
Positive forward distance / 100 passes (lower)
Long-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty+0.70 z
Under-pressure pass rate+0.51 z
Progressive-pass rate-0.68 z
Long-pass rate-0.48 z
Positive forward distance / 100 passes-0.54 z
Carry share of actions+1.98 z
Bars are z-scores relative to eligible positional peers, not percentiles or ratings. Distance-based style separation, not a probability. Smaller values mean the player lies nearer the boundary between the two archetypes.
Role Fit
FWD role
How closely a player's playing style matches this role. Compared with the observed role of Leverkusen's other FWD contributors.
#3 of 3Comparable current-team forward profilesRaw distance: 0.758
Lower distance means closer stylistic resemblance.
Closest stylistic dimensions
- Progressive passing rate
- Expected completion rate
- Long-pass rate
Largest stylistic difference
Carry involvement
higher sampleObserved across 23 matchesRole: 22 matches · 2 contributors
Limited contributor diversity: this leave-self-out role profile is based on 2 other contributing forwards across 22 observed matches.
Role Fit compares observed playing style. It does not predict player quality, transfer success, or future performance.
Expected Goals
Non-penalty shooting
Goals above expected is descriptive for this observed sample, not a definitive finishing-skill rating.
Shots
77
19 matches observed
Goals
10
Total xG
10.8
Goals above expected
-0.8
xG / shot
0.1
13.0% goals / shot
Campos visualization
Shot map
Non-penalty xG is encoded by marker size and color. Preserved penalties have no modeled xG.
Shots81
Goals14
xG10.80
xG0.00 – 1.00
Foot
Header
Set piece
Corner
Green outline = GoalNormal outline = Non-goal
Attacking impact
Impact of passes and carries
Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.
Overall impact / 100 actions
-0.018
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.588
Carrying impact / 100 carries
+0.408
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
+0.258
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
+0.152
887 actions · 379 passes · 508 carries · 46.4% increased attacking value
Campos visualization
Carry value map
Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.
Situational execution
Under pressure
105 attempts
- Actual
- 62.9%
- Pass difficulty
- 72.8%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -9.9 pp
Progressive passing
47 attempts
- Actual
- 61.7%
- Pass difficulty
- 56.9%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- +4.8 pp
Long passing
36 attempts
- Actual
- 66.7%
- Pass difficulty
- 70.4%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -3.7 pp
Progression profile
Progressive-pass rate
12.0%
Pressure-pass rate
26.9%
Average forward distance
-0.3 m
Positive forward distance / 100
437.9 m
Final-third entries / 100
6.1
Campos visualization
Pass map
Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.
Showing 1–200 of 391 passes
CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
- Pass difficulty
- 98.9%
- Outcome
- Completed
- Attacking impact
- -0.0041
- Value before
- 0.0184
- Value after
- 0.0143
- Length
- 8.9 m
- Context
- Standard
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.
Similar playing styles
Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.
100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.
Style similarity
65.5 / 100
Expected Completion RateProgressive Pass RatePositive Forward Distance Per 100 Passes
Sample support: Higher · 7 limiting matches
Observed: 23 vs 7 matches
Style similarity
64.8 / 100
Pressure Pass Rate