Pass difficulty
85.2%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 229
requires 10 eligible position peers
Player profile
Patrik Schick
Bayer Leverkusen · Center Forward · FWD
Matches observed20
Pass attempts229
Reliable sampleActual completion
82.1%
188 completed passes
Pass difficulty
85.2%
How difficult a pass was to complete.
Actual vs. expected passing
-3.1 pp
-7.0 completions vs model expectation
Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.
Player intelligence
Position profile
FWD context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.
Insufficient eligible position metrics for a meaningful radar.
Style
Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.
Under-pressure pass rate
30.6%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 229
requires 10 eligible position peers
Progressive pass rate
5.7%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 229
requires 10 eligible position peers
Long-pass rate
3.9%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 229
requires 10 eligible position peers
Average forward distance
-2.0 units
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 229
requires 10 eligible position peers
Positive forward distance / 100 passes
226.4 units
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 229
requires 10 eligible position peers
Final-third entries / 100 passes
3.493
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 229
requires 10 eligible position peers
Carry share of actions
49.4%
68th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 437
Progressive carry rate
6.0%
63rd percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 216
Progressive action rate
5.9%
16th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 437
Under-pressure action rate
44.9%
79th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 437
Shots / observed match
1.95 / match
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 2 eligible peers · sample 39
requires 10 eligible position peers
xG / shot
12.9%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 2 eligible peers · sample 39
requires 10 eligible position peers
Performance
Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.
Actual vs. expected passing
-3.1 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 229
requires 10 eligible position peers
Under-pressure completion above expected
-6.2 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 70
requires 10 eligible position peers
Progressive completion above expected
+25.4 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 13
requires 20 progressive passes
Long-pass completion above expected
-1.6 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 1 eligible peers · sample 9
requires 20 long passes
Goals above expected
0.988
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 2 eligible peers · sample 39
requires 10 eligible position peers
Overall impact / 100 actions
-0.200
26th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 437
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.639
0th percentile among FWD players
n = 19 eligible peers · sample 221
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Carrying impact / 100 carries
0.249
84th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 216
Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
0.072
63rd percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 437
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
-0.017
21st percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 437
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Playing style
Safe Circulator
Position-relative style among eligible FWD players.
Style separation0.609
Progressive-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty (higher)
Positive forward distance / 100 passes (lower)
Long-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty+1.30 z
Under-pressure pass rate+0.98 z
Progressive-pass rate-1.29 z
Long-pass rate-0.98 z
Positive forward distance / 100 passes-1.45 z
Carry share of actions+0.61 z
Bars are z-scores relative to eligible positional peers, not percentiles or ratings. Distance-based style separation, not a probability. Smaller values mean the player lies nearer the boundary between the two archetypes.
Leverkusen Role Fit
FWD role
How closely a player's playing style matches this role. Compared with the observed role of Leverkusen's other FWD contributors.
Role distance · lower is closer0.723
CloserFarther
Strongest alignment
- Pressure Pass Rate
- Long Pass Rate
- Expected Completion Rate
Largest difference
Carry Share Of Actions
higher sampleObserved across 20 matchesRole: 28 matches · 2 contributors
Limited contributor diversity: this leave-self-out role profile is based on 2 other contributing forwards across 28 observed matches.
Role Fit measures how closely a player's observed playing style resembles Bayer Leverkusen's observed positional-role style. It does not predict transfer success or future performance.
Expected Goals
Non-penalty shooting
Goals above expected is descriptive for this observed sample, not a definitive finishing-skill rating.
Shots
39
16 matches observed
Goals
6
Total xG
5.0
Goals above expected
+1.0
xG / shot
0.1
15.4% goals / shot
Campos visualization
Shot map
Non-penalty xG is encoded by marker size and color. Preserved penalties have no modeled xG.
Shots40
Goals7
xG5.01
xG0.00 – 1.00
Foot
Header
Set piece
Corner
Green outline = GoalNormal outline = Non-goal
Attacking impact
Impact of passes and carries
Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.
Overall impact / 100 actions
-0.200
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.639
Carrying impact / 100 carries
+0.249
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
+0.072
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
-0.017
437 actions · 221 passes · 216 carries · 41.0% increased attacking value
Campos visualization
Carry value map
Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.
Situational execution
Under pressure
70 attempts
- Actual
- 72.9%
- Pass difficulty
- 79.0%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -6.2 pp
Progressive passing
13 attempts
- Actual
- 69.2%
- Pass difficulty
- 43.8%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- +25.4 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Long passing
9 attempts
- Actual
- 66.7%
- Pass difficulty
- 68.2%
- Actual vs. expected passing
Progression profile
Progressive-pass rate
5.7%
Pressure-pass rate
30.6%
Average forward distance
-2.0 m
Positive forward distance / 100
226.4 m
Final-third entries / 100
3.5
Campos visualization
Pass map
Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.
Showing 1–200 of 229 passes
CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
- Pass difficulty
- 78.2%
- Outcome
- Incomplete
- Attacking impact
- -0.0135
- Value before
- 0.0135
- Value after
- 0.0000
- Length
- 17.8 m
- Context
- Under pressure
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.
Similar playing styles
Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.
100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.
Style similarity
81.2 / 100
Long Pass RateProgressive Pass RatePositive Forward Distance Per 100 Passes
Sample support: Limited · 2 limiting matches
Observed: 20 vs 2 matches
Style similarity
73.1 / 100
Carry Share Of ActionsLong Pass Rate