Pass difficulty
73.7%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 55
requires 100 passes
Player profile
Marvin Ducksch
Werder Bremen · Left Center Forward · FWD
Matches observed2
Pass attempts55
Limited sampleActual completion
60.0%
33 completed passes
Pass difficulty
73.7%
How difficult a pass was to complete.
Actual vs. expected passing
-13.7 pp
-7.5 completions vs model expectation
Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.
Player intelligence
Position profile
FWD context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.
Insufficient eligible position metrics for a meaningful radar.
Style
Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.
Under-pressure pass rate
23.6%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 55
requires 100 passes
Progressive pass rate
29.1%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 55
requires 100 passes
Long-pass rate
16.4%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 55
requires 100 passes
Average forward distance
2.6 units
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 55
requires 100 passes
Positive forward distance / 100 passes
684.0 units
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 55
requires 100 passes
Final-third entries / 100 passes
9.091
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 55
requires 100 passes
Carry share of actions
37.2%
5th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 78
Progressive carry rate
3.4%
53rd percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 29
Progressive action rate
19.2%
84th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 78
Under-pressure action rate
32.1%
21st percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 78
Shots / observed match
0.00 / match
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 2 eligible peers · sample 0
requires 20 shots
xG / shot
—
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 2 eligible peers · sample 0
metric unavailable
Performance
Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.
Actual vs. expected passing
-13.7 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 55
requires 100 passes
Under-pressure completion above expected
-16.8 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 13
requires 20 pressure passes
Progressive completion above expected
-18.4 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 16
requires 20 progressive passes
Long-pass completion above expected
-32.0 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 1 eligible peers · sample 9
requires 20 long passes
Goals above expected
0.000
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 2 eligible peers · sample 0
requires 20 shots
Overall impact / 100 actions
-0.113
42nd percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 78
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.306
56th percentile among FWD players
n = 19 eligible peers · sample 49
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Carrying impact / 100 carries
0.214
63rd percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 29
Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
-0.015
32nd percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 78
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
-0.010
37th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 78
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Playing style
Direct Progressor
Position-relative style among eligible FWD players.
Style separation0.590
Progressive-pass rate (higher)
Pass difficulty (lower)
Positive forward distance / 100 passes (higher)
Long-pass rate (higher)
Pass difficulty-0.63 z
Under-pressure pass rate+0.09 z
Progressive-pass rate+0.93 z
Long-pass rate+0.21 z
Positive forward distance / 100 passes+0.51 z
Carry share of actions-1.52 z
Bars are z-scores relative to eligible positional peers, not percentiles or ratings. Distance-based style separation, not a probability. Smaller values mean the player lies nearer the boundary between the two archetypes.
Leverkusen Role Fit
FWD role
How closely a player's playing style matches this role. Compared with Bayer Leverkusen's observed FWD role.
Role distance · lower is closer1.706
CloserFarther
Strongest alignment
- Pressure Pass Rate
- Long Pass Rate
- Positive Forward Distance Per 100 Passes
Largest difference
Carry Share Of Actions
limited sampleObserved across 2 matchesRole: 33 matches · 3 contributors
Limited contributor diversity: this role profile is based on three contributing forwards across 33 observed matches and is more sensitive to individual-player composition than the DEF and MID profiles.
Role Fit measures how closely a player's observed playing style resembles Bayer Leverkusen's observed positional-role style. It does not predict transfer success or future performance.
Attacking impact
Impact of passes and carries
Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.
Overall impact / 100 actions
-0.113
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.306
Carrying impact / 100 carries
+0.214
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
-0.015
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
-0.010
78 actions · 49 passes · 29 carries · 41.0% increased attacking value
Campos visualization
Carry value map
Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.
Situational execution
Under pressure
13 attempts
- Actual
- 61.5%
- Pass difficulty
- 78.3%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -16.8 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Progressive passing
16 attempts
- Actual
- 31.3%
- Pass difficulty
- 49.7%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -18.4 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Long passing
9 attempts
- Actual
- 11.1%
- Pass difficulty
- 43.1%
Progression profile
Progressive-pass rate
29.1%
Pressure-pass rate
23.6%
Average forward distance
2.6 m
Positive forward distance / 100
684.0 m
Final-third entries / 100
9.1
Campos visualization
Pass map
Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.
Showing 1–55 of 55 passes
CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
- Pass difficulty
- 45.1%
- Outcome
- Completed
- Attacking impact
- 0.0057
- Value before
- 0.0075
- Value after
- 0.0132
- Length
- 27.6 m
- Context
- Progressive
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.
Similar playing styles
Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.
100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.
Limited sample: this player's style profile is based on 2 observed matches, so nearest-neighbor rankings may be less stable.
Style similarity
74.3 / 100
Pressure Pass RateCarry Share Of ActionsLong Pass Rate
Sample support: Limited · 2 limiting matches
Observed: 2 vs 2 matches
Style similarity
64.8 / 100