Pass difficulty
71.9%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 50
requires 100 passes
Player profile
Vincenzo Grifo
Freiburg · Left Wing · FWD
Matches observed2
Pass attempts50
Limited sampleActual completion
68.0%
34 completed passes
Pass difficulty
71.9%
How difficult a pass was to complete.
Actual vs. expected passing
-3.9 pp
-1.9 completions vs model expectation
Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.
Player intelligence
Position profile
FWD context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.
Insufficient eligible position metrics for a meaningful radar.
Style
Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.
Under-pressure pass rate
6.0%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 50
requires 100 passes
Progressive pass rate
30.0%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 50
requires 100 passes
Long-pass rate
36.0%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 50
requires 100 passes
Average forward distance
2.6 units
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 50
requires 100 passes
Positive forward distance / 100 passes
907.0 units
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 50
requires 100 passes
Final-third entries / 100 passes
12.000
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 50
requires 100 passes
Carry share of actions
40.3%
21st percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 77
Progressive carry rate
3.2%
39th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 31
Progressive action rate
16.9%
74th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 77
Under-pressure action rate
14.3%
0th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 77
Shots / observed match
0.00 / match
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 2 eligible peers · sample 0
requires 20 shots
xG / shot
—
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 2 eligible peers · sample 0
metric unavailable
Performance
Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.
Actual vs. expected passing
-3.9 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 50
requires 100 passes
Under-pressure completion above expected
-4.4 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 3
requires 20 pressure passes
Progressive completion above expected
-4.1 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 15
requires 20 progressive passes
Long-pass completion above expected
-9.3 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 1 eligible peers · sample 18
requires 20 long passes
Goals above expected
0.000
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 2 eligible peers · sample 0
requires 20 shots
Overall impact / 100 actions
-0.027
74th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 77
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.121
83rd percentile among FWD players
n = 19 eligible peers · sample 46
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Carrying impact / 100 carries
0.112
16th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 31
Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
0.156
74th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 77
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
-0.011
32nd percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 77
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Playing style
Direct Progressor
Position-relative style among eligible FWD players.
Style separation0.447
Progressive-pass rate (higher)
Pass difficulty (lower)
Positive forward distance / 100 passes (higher)
Long-pass rate (higher)
Pass difficulty-0.94 z
Under-pressure pass rate-2.17 z
Progressive-pass rate+1.02 z
Long-pass rate+2.08 z
Positive forward distance / 100 passes+1.46 z
Carry share of actions-0.98 z
Bars are z-scores relative to eligible positional peers, not percentiles or ratings. Distance-based style separation, not a probability. Smaller values mean the player lies nearer the boundary between the two archetypes.
Role Fit
FWD role
How closely a player's playing style matches this role. Compared with Bayer Leverkusen's observed FWD role.
#8 of 8Comparable external forward candidatesRaw distance: 2.405
Lower distance means closer stylistic resemblance.
Closest stylistic dimensions
- Expected completion rate
- Progressive passing rate
- Forward distance per 100 passes
Largest stylistic difference
Passes under pressure
limited sampleObserved across 2 matchesRole: 33 matches · 3 contributors
Limited contributor diversity: this role profile is based on three contributing forwards across 33 observed matches and is more sensitive to individual-player composition than the DEF and MID profiles.
Role Fit compares observed playing style. It does not predict player quality, transfer success, or future performance.
Attacking impact
Impact of passes and carries
Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.
Overall impact / 100 actions
-0.027
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.121
Carrying impact / 100 carries
+0.112
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
+0.156
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
-0.011
77 actions · 46 passes · 31 carries · 39.0% increased attacking value
Campos visualization
Carry value map
Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.
Situational execution
Under pressure
3 attempts
- Actual
- 66.7%
- Pass difficulty
- 71.1%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -4.4 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Progressive passing
15 attempts
- Actual
- 33.3%
- Pass difficulty
- 37.4%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -4.1 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Long passing
18 attempts
- Actual
- 55.6%
- Pass difficulty
- 64.9%
Progression profile
Progressive-pass rate
30.0%
Pressure-pass rate
6.0%
Average forward distance
2.6 m
Positive forward distance / 100
907.0 m
Final-third entries / 100
12.0
Campos visualization
Pass map
Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.
Showing 1–50 of 50 passes
CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
- Pass difficulty
- 92.7%
- Outcome
- Incomplete
- Attacking impact
- —
- Value before
- —
- Value after
- —
- Length
- 3.2 m
- Context
- Standard
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.
Similar playing styles
Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.
100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.
Limited sample: this player's style profile is based on 2 observed matches, so nearest-neighbor rankings may be less stable.
Style similarity
71.3 / 100
Expected Completion RateCarry Share Of ActionsProgressive Pass Rate
Sample support: Limited · 2 limiting matches
Observed: 2 vs 2 matches
Style similarity
52.3 / 100