Pass difficulty
69.7%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 54
requires 100 passes
Player profile
Brajan Gruda
FSV Mainz 05 · Right Wing · FWD
Matches observed2
Pass attempts54
Limited sampleActual completion
64.8%
35 completed passes
Pass difficulty
69.7%
How difficult a pass was to complete.
Actual vs. expected passing
-4.9 pp
-2.6 completions vs model expectation
Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.
Player intelligence
Position profile
FWD context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.
Insufficient eligible position metrics for a meaningful radar.
Style
Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.
Under-pressure pass rate
20.4%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 54
requires 100 passes
Progressive pass rate
31.5%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 54
requires 100 passes
Long-pass rate
20.4%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 54
requires 100 passes
Average forward distance
3.9 units
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 54
requires 100 passes
Positive forward distance / 100 passes
732.0 units
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 54
requires 100 passes
Final-third entries / 100 passes
7.407
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 54
requires 100 passes
Carry share of actions
49.0%
63rd percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 96
Progressive carry rate
12.8%
89th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 47
Progressive action rate
22.9%
100th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 96
Under-pressure action rate
40.6%
63rd percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 96
Shots / observed match
0.50 / match
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 2 eligible peers · sample 1
requires 20 shots
xG / shot
3.2%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 2 eligible peers · sample 1
requires 20 shots
Performance
Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.
Actual vs. expected passing
-4.9 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 54
requires 100 passes
Under-pressure completion above expected
-10.4 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 11
requires 20 pressure passes
Progressive completion above expected
+3.2 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 17
requires 20 progressive passes
Long-pass completion above expected
-6.1 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 1 eligible peers · sample 11
requires 20 long passes
Goals above expected
-0.032
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 2 eligible peers · sample 1
requires 20 shots
Overall impact / 100 actions
0.101
84th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 96
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.084
89th percentile among FWD players
n = 19 eligible peers · sample 49
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Carrying impact / 100 carries
0.294
89th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 47
Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
0.135
68th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 96
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
0.063
63rd percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 96
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Playing style
Direct Progressor
Position-relative style among eligible FWD players.
Style separation0.611
Progressive-pass rate (higher)
Pass difficulty (lower)
Positive forward distance / 100 passes (higher)
Long-pass rate (higher)
Pass difficulty-1.31 z
Under-pressure pass rate-0.33 z
Progressive-pass rate+1.16 z
Long-pass rate+0.59 z
Positive forward distance / 100 passes+0.71 z
Carry share of actions+0.53 z
Bars are z-scores relative to eligible positional peers, not percentiles or ratings. Distance-based style separation, not a probability. Smaller values mean the player lies nearer the boundary between the two archetypes.
Leverkusen Role Fit
FWD role
How closely a player's playing style matches this role. Compared with Bayer Leverkusen's observed FWD role.
Role distance · lower is closer1.587
CloserFarther
Strongest alignment
- Carry Share Of Actions
- Pressure Pass Rate
- Long Pass Rate
Largest difference
Expected Completion Rate
limited sampleObserved across 2 matchesRole: 33 matches · 3 contributors
Limited contributor diversity: this role profile is based on three contributing forwards across 33 observed matches and is more sensitive to individual-player composition than the DEF and MID profiles.
Role Fit measures how closely a player's observed playing style resembles Bayer Leverkusen's observed positional-role style. It does not predict transfer success or future performance.
Expected Goals
Non-penalty shooting
Goals above expected is descriptive for this observed sample, not a definitive finishing-skill rating.
Shots
1
1 matches observed
Goals
0
Total xG
0.0
Goals above expected
-0.0
xG / shot
0.0
0.0% goals / shot
Limited sample: fewer than 20 non-penalty shots.
Campos visualization
Shot map
Non-penalty xG is encoded by marker size and color. Preserved penalties have no modeled xG.
Shots1
Goals0
xG0.03
xG0.00 – 1.00
Green outline = GoalNormal outline = Non-goal
Attacking impact
Impact of passes and carries
Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.
Overall impact / 100 actions
+0.101
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.084
Carrying impact / 100 carries
+0.294
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
+0.135
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
+0.063
96 actions · 49 passes · 47 carries · 55.2% increased attacking value
Campos visualization
Carry value map
Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.
Situational execution
Under pressure
11 attempts
- Actual
- 36.4%
- Pass difficulty
- 46.7%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -10.4 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Progressive passing
17 attempts
- Actual
- 52.9%
- Pass difficulty
- 49.7%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- +3.2 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Long passing
11 attempts
- Actual
- 45.5%
- Pass difficulty
- 51.6%
Progression profile
Progressive-pass rate
31.5%
Pressure-pass rate
20.4%
Average forward distance
3.9 m
Positive forward distance / 100
732.0 m
Final-third entries / 100
7.4
Campos visualization
Pass map
Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.
Showing 1–54 of 54 passes
CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
- Pass difficulty
- 42.3%
- Outcome
- Completed
- Attacking impact
- 0.0054
- Value before
- 0.0077
- Value after
- 0.0130
- Length
- 24.4 m
- Context
- Progressive
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.
Similar playing styles
Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.
100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.
Limited sample: this player's style profile is based on 2 observed matches, so nearest-neighbor rankings may be less stable.
Style similarity
69.1 / 100
Progressive Pass RatePositive Forward Distance Per 100 PassesExpected Completion Rate
Sample support: Limited · 2 limiting matches
Observed: 2 vs 2 matches
Style similarity
60.9 / 100