Pass difficulty
93.3%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 61
requires 100 passes
Player profile
Konrad Laimer
Bayern Munich · Right Back · DEF
Matches observed1
Pass attempts61
Limited sampleActual completion
91.8%
56 completed passes
Pass difficulty
93.3%
How difficult a pass was to complete.
Actual vs. expected passing
-1.5 pp
-0.9 completions vs model expectation
Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.
Player intelligence
Position profile
DEF context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.
Insufficient eligible position metrics for a meaningful radar.
Style
Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.
Under-pressure pass rate
19.7%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 61
requires 100 passes
Progressive pass rate
4.9%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 61
requires 100 passes
Long-pass rate
1.6%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 61
requires 100 passes
Average forward distance
-0.6 units
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 61
requires 100 passes
Positive forward distance / 100 passes
464.1 units
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 61
requires 100 passes
Final-third entries / 100 passes
6.557
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 61
requires 100 passes
Carry share of actions
44.3%
58th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 106
Progressive carry rate
6.4%
85th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 47
Progressive action rate
5.7%
20th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 106
Under-pressure action rate
19.8%
74th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 106
Shots / observed match
2.00 / match
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 2
requires 20 shots
xG / shot
6.2%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 2
requires 20 shots
Performance
Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.
Actual vs. expected passing
-1.5 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 61
requires 100 passes
Under-pressure completion above expected
-13.1 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 13 eligible peers · sample 12
requires 20 pressure passes
Progressive completion above expected
-17.7 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 17 eligible peers · sample 3
requires 20 progressive passes
Long-pass completion above expected
+2.0 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 21 eligible peers · sample 1
requires 20 long passes
Goals above expected
-0.125
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 2
requires 20 shots
Overall impact / 100 actions
0.004
40th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 106
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.078
30th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 59
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Carrying impact / 100 carries
0.106
78th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 47
Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
0.020
62nd percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 106
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
-0.011
11th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 106
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Playing style
Safe Circulator
Position-relative style among eligible DEF players.
Style separation0.477
Progressive-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty (higher)
Positive forward distance / 100 passes (lower)
Long-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty+1.63 z
Under-pressure pass rate+1.34 z
Progressive-pass rate-1.56 z
Long-pass rate-2.14 z
Positive forward distance / 100 passes-1.70 z
Carry share of actions+0.14 z
Bars are z-scores relative to eligible positional peers, not percentiles or ratings. Distance-based style separation, not a probability. Smaller values mean the player lies nearer the boundary between the two archetypes.
Leverkusen Role Fit
DEF role
How closely a player's playing style matches this role. Compared with Bayer Leverkusen's observed DEF role.
Role distance · lower is closer1.071
CloserFarther
Strongest alignment
- Carry Share Of Actions
- Positive Forward Distance Per 100 Passes
- Progressive Pass Rate
Largest difference
Pressure Pass Rate
limited sampleObserved across 1 matchesRole: 34 matches · 9 contributors
Role Fit measures how closely a player's observed playing style resembles Bayer Leverkusen's observed positional-role style. It does not predict transfer success or future performance.
Expected Goals
Non-penalty shooting
Goals above expected is descriptive for this observed sample, not a definitive finishing-skill rating.
Shots
2
1 matches observed
Goals
0
Total xG
0.1
Goals above expected
-0.1
xG / shot
0.1
0.0% goals / shot
Limited sample: fewer than 20 non-penalty shots.
Campos visualization
Shot map
Non-penalty xG is encoded by marker size and color. Preserved penalties have no modeled xG.
Shots2
Goals0
xG0.12
xG0.00 – 1.00
Foot
Corner
Green outline = GoalNormal outline = Non-goal
Attacking impact
Impact of passes and carries
Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.
Overall impact / 100 actions
+0.004
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.078
Carrying impact / 100 carries
+0.106
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
+0.020
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
-0.011
106 actions · 59 passes · 47 carries · 59.4% increased attacking value
Campos visualization
Carry value map
Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.
Situational execution
Under pressure
12 attempts
- Actual
- 75.0%
- Pass difficulty
- 88.1%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -13.1 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Progressive passing
3 attempts
- Actual
- 66.7%
- Pass difficulty
- 84.3%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -17.7 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Long passing
1 attempts
- Actual
- 100.0%
- Pass difficulty
- 98.0%
Progression profile
Progressive-pass rate
4.9%
Pressure-pass rate
19.7%
Average forward distance
-0.6 m
Positive forward distance / 100
464.1 m
Final-third entries / 100
6.6
Campos visualization
Pass map
Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.
Showing 1–61 of 61 passes
CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
- Pass difficulty
- 99.1%
- Outcome
- Completed
- Attacking impact
- 0.0025
- Value before
- 0.0031
- Value after
- 0.0056
- Length
- 23.0 m
- Context
- Under pressure
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.
Similar playing styles
Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.
100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.
Limited sample: this player's style profile is based on 1 observed match, so nearest-neighbor rankings may be less stable.
Style similarity
76.6 / 100
Progressive Pass RateLong Pass RateCarry Share Of Actions
Sample support: Limited · 1 limiting matches
Observed: 1 vs 1 matches
Style similarity
65.9 / 100