Pass difficulty
86.9%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 51
requires 100 passes
Player profile
Mads Pedersen
Augsburg · Right Back · DEF
Matches observed1
Pass attempts51
Limited sampleActual completion
92.2%
47 completed passes
Pass difficulty
86.9%
How difficult a pass was to complete.
Actual vs. expected passing
+5.3 pp
+2.7 completions vs model expectation
Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.
Player intelligence
Position profile
DEF context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.
Insufficient eligible position metrics for a meaningful radar.
Style
Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.
Under-pressure pass rate
19.6%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 51
requires 100 passes
Progressive pass rate
19.6%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 51
requires 100 passes
Long-pass rate
3.9%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 51
requires 100 passes
Average forward distance
1.8 units
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 51
requires 100 passes
Positive forward distance / 100 passes
614.5 units
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 51
requires 100 passes
Final-third entries / 100 passes
3.922
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 51
requires 100 passes
Carry share of actions
42.9%
26th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 84
Progressive carry rate
2.8%
54th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 36
Progressive action rate
13.1%
73rd percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 84
Under-pressure action rate
26.2%
96th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 84
Shots / observed match
0.00 / match
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 0
requires 20 shots
xG / shot
—
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 0
metric unavailable
Performance
Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.
Actual vs. expected passing
+5.3 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 51
requires 100 passes
Under-pressure completion above expected
+10.8 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 13 eligible peers · sample 10
requires 20 pressure passes
Progressive completion above expected
+13.0 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 17 eligible peers · sample 10
requires 20 progressive passes
Long-pass completion above expected
+6.0 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 21 eligible peers · sample 2
requires 20 long passes
Goals above expected
0.000
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 0
requires 20 shots
Overall impact / 100 actions
0.019
53rd percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 84
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Passing impact / 100 passes
0.028
81st percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 48
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Carrying impact / 100 carries
0.007
2nd percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 36
Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
0.072
83rd percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 84
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
-0.030
3rd percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 84
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Playing style
Safe Circulator
Position-relative style among eligible DEF players.
Style separation0.378
Progressive-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty (higher)
Positive forward distance / 100 passes (lower)
Long-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty+0.53 z
Under-pressure pass rate+1.32 z
Progressive-pass rate+0.47 z
Long-pass rate-1.80 z
Positive forward distance / 100 passes-1.08 z
Carry share of actions-0.40 z
Bars are z-scores relative to eligible positional peers, not percentiles or ratings. Distance-based style separation, not a probability. Smaller values mean the player lies nearer the boundary between the two archetypes.
Leverkusen Role Fit
DEF role
How closely a player's playing style matches this role. Compared with Bayer Leverkusen's observed DEF role.
Role distance · lower is closer0.959
CloserFarther
Strongest alignment
- Expected Completion Rate
- Positive Forward Distance Per 100 Passes
- Long Pass Rate
Largest difference
Pressure Pass Rate
limited sampleObserved across 1 matchesRole: 34 matches · 9 contributors
Role Fit measures how closely a player's observed playing style resembles Bayer Leverkusen's observed positional-role style. It does not predict transfer success or future performance.
Attacking impact
Impact of passes and carries
Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.
Overall impact / 100 actions
+0.019
Passing impact / 100 passes
+0.028
Carrying impact / 100 carries
+0.007
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
+0.072
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
-0.030
84 actions · 48 passes · 36 carries · 58.3% increased attacking value
Campos visualization
Carry value map
Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.
Situational execution
Under pressure
10 attempts
- Actual
- 80.0%
- Pass difficulty
- 69.2%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- +10.8 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Progressive passing
10 attempts
- Actual
- 90.0%
- Pass difficulty
- 77.0%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- +13.0 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Long passing
2 attempts
- Actual
- 100.0%
- Pass difficulty
- 94.0%
Progression profile
Progressive-pass rate
19.6%
Pressure-pass rate
19.6%
Average forward distance
1.8 m
Positive forward distance / 100
614.5 m
Final-third entries / 100
3.9
Campos visualization
Pass map
Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.
Showing 1–51 of 51 passes
CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
- Pass difficulty
- 98.5%
- Outcome
- Completed
- Attacking impact
- —
- Value before
- —
- Value after
- —
- Length
- 25.5 m
- Context
- Under pressure
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.
Similar playing styles
Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.
100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.
Limited sample: this player's style profile is based on 1 observed match, so nearest-neighbor rankings may be less stable.
Style similarity
67.2 / 100
Progressive Pass RatePressure Pass RateCarry Share Of Actions
Sample support: Limited · 1 limiting matches
Observed: 1 vs 2 matches
Style similarity
64.3 / 100