Pass difficulty
88.0%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 55
requires 100 passes
Player profile
Sacha Boey
Bayern Munich · Left Wing Back · DEF
Matches observed1
Pass attempts55
Limited sampleActual completion
87.3%
48 completed passes
Pass difficulty
88.0%
How difficult a pass was to complete.
Actual vs. expected passing
-0.8 pp
-0.4 completions vs model expectation
Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.
Player intelligence
Position profile
DEF context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.
Insufficient eligible position metrics for a meaningful radar.
Style
Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.
Under-pressure pass rate
16.4%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 55
requires 100 passes
Progressive pass rate
3.6%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 55
requires 100 passes
Long-pass rate
0.0%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 55
requires 100 passes
Average forward distance
-1.6 units
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 55
requires 100 passes
Positive forward distance / 100 passes
388.7 units
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 55
requires 100 passes
Final-third entries / 100 passes
0.000
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 55
requires 100 passes
Carry share of actions
43.5%
37th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 92
Progressive carry rate
5.0%
78th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 40
Progressive action rate
4.3%
10th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 92
Under-pressure action rate
33.7%
99th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 92
Shots / observed match
1.00 / match
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 1
requires 20 shots
xG / shot
26.3%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 1
requires 20 shots
Performance
Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.
Actual vs. expected passing
-0.8 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 55
requires 100 passes
Under-pressure completion above expected
-11.5 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 13 eligible peers · sample 9
requires 20 pressure passes
Progressive completion above expected
-12.2 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 17 eligible peers · sample 2
requires 20 progressive passes
Long-pass completion above expected
—
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 21 eligible peers · sample 0
metric unavailable
Goals above expected
-0.263
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 1
requires 20 shots
Overall impact / 100 actions
-0.099
8th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 92
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.242
9th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 52
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Carrying impact / 100 carries
0.085
70th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 40
Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
-0.022
28th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 92
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
0.015
47th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 92
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Playing style
Safe Circulator
Position-relative style among eligible DEF players.
Style separation0.461
Progressive-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty (higher)
Positive forward distance / 100 passes (lower)
Long-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty+0.72 z
Under-pressure pass rate+0.74 z
Progressive-pass rate-1.74 z
Long-pass rate-2.39 z
Positive forward distance / 100 passes-2.01 z
Carry share of actions-0.17 z
Bars are z-scores relative to eligible positional peers, not percentiles or ratings. Distance-based style separation, not a probability. Smaller values mean the player lies nearer the boundary between the two archetypes.
Leverkusen Role Fit
DEF role
How closely a player's playing style matches this role. Compared with Bayer Leverkusen's observed DEF role.
Role distance · lower is closer1.054
CloserFarther
Strongest alignment
- Expected Completion Rate
- Pressure Pass Rate
- Carry Share Of Actions
Largest difference
Long Pass Rate
limited sampleObserved across 1 matchesRole: 34 matches · 9 contributors
Role Fit measures how closely a player's observed playing style resembles Bayer Leverkusen's observed positional-role style. It does not predict transfer success or future performance.
Expected Goals
Non-penalty shooting
Goals above expected is descriptive for this observed sample, not a definitive finishing-skill rating.
Shots
1
1 matches observed
Goals
0
Total xG
0.3
Goals above expected
-0.3
xG / shot
0.3
0.0% goals / shot
Limited sample: fewer than 20 non-penalty shots.
Campos visualization
Shot map
Non-penalty xG is encoded by marker size and color. Preserved penalties have no modeled xG.
Shots1
Goals0
xG0.26
xG0.00 – 1.00
Green outline = GoalNormal outline = Non-goal
Attacking impact
Impact of passes and carries
Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.
Overall impact / 100 actions
-0.099
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.242
Carrying impact / 100 carries
+0.085
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
-0.022
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
+0.015
92 actions · 52 passes · 40 carries · 43.5% increased attacking value
Campos visualization
Carry value map
Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.
Situational execution
Under pressure
9 attempts
- Actual
- 77.8%
- Pass difficulty
- 89.3%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -11.5 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Progressive passing
2 attempts
- Actual
- 50.0%
- Pass difficulty
- 62.2%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -12.2 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Long passing
0 attempts
- Actual
- —
- Pass difficulty
- —
Progression profile
Progressive-pass rate
3.6%
Pressure-pass rate
16.4%
Average forward distance
-1.6 m
Positive forward distance / 100
388.7 m
Final-third entries / 100
0.0
Campos visualization
Pass map
Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.
Showing 1–55 of 55 passes
CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
- Pass difficulty
- 99.4%
- Outcome
- Completed
- Attacking impact
- 0.0016
- Value before
- 0.0038
- Value after
- 0.0054
- Length
- 28.5 m
- Context
- Under pressure
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.
Similar playing styles
Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.
100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.
Limited sample: this player's style profile is based on 1 observed match, so nearest-neighbor rankings may be less stable.
Style similarity
76.6 / 100
Progressive Pass RateLong Pass RateCarry Share Of Actions
Sample support: Limited · 1 limiting matches
Observed: 1 vs 1 matches
Style similarity
62.7 / 100