FSFootyScout
PlayersTeam IntelligenceScoutingLeaderboardCompareArchetypesModel

FootyScout · Football scouting and analytics

Based on available StatsBomb 2023/24 Bundesliga event data.

Player profile

Willi Orban

RB Leipzig · Left Center Back · DEF

Matches observed1
Pass attempts93
Limited sample

Actual completion

89.2%

83 completed passes

Pass difficulty

90.6%

How difficult a pass was to complete.

Actual vs. expected passing

-1.4 pp

-1.3 completions vs model expectation

Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.

Player intelligence

Position profile

DEF context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.

Insufficient eligible position metrics for a meaningful radar.

Style

Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.

Pass difficulty

90.6%

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 23 eligible peers · sample 93

requires 100 passes

Under-pressure pass rate

3.2%

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 23 eligible peers · sample 93

requires 100 passes

Progressive pass rate

10.8%

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 23 eligible peers · sample 93

requires 100 passes

Long-pass rate

11.8%

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 23 eligible peers · sample 93

requires 100 passes

Average forward distance

5.8 units

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 23 eligible peers · sample 93

requires 100 passes

Positive forward distance / 100 passes

774.2 units

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 23 eligible peers · sample 93

requires 100 passes

Final-third entries / 100 passes

4.301

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 23 eligible peers · sample 93

requires 100 passes

Carry share of actions

44.7%

61st percentile among DEF players

n = 94 eligible peers · sample 161

Progressive carry rate

0.0%

16th percentile among DEF players

n = 87 eligible peers · sample 72

Progressive action rate

5.6%

18th percentile among DEF players

n = 94 eligible peers · sample 161

Under-pressure action rate

5.0%

6th percentile among DEF players

n = 94 eligible peers · sample 161

Shots / observed match

0.00 / match

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 4 eligible peers · sample 0

requires 20 shots

xG / shot

—

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 4 eligible peers · sample 0

metric unavailable

Performance

Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.

Actual vs. expected passing

-1.4 pp

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 23 eligible peers · sample 93

requires 100 passes

Under-pressure completion above expected

+15.7 pp

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 13 eligible peers · sample 3

requires 20 pressure passes

Progressive completion above expected

-13.5 pp

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 17 eligible peers · sample 10

requires 20 progressive passes

Long-pass completion above expected

-2.2 pp

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 21 eligible peers · sample 11

requires 20 long passes

Goals above expected

0.000

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 4 eligible peers · sample 0

requires 20 shots

Overall impact / 100 actions

-0.022

23rd percentile among DEF players

n = 94 eligible peers · sample 161

Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.

Passing impact / 100 passes

-0.072

32nd percentile among DEF players

n = 94 eligible peers · sample 89

Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.

Carrying impact / 100 carries

0.040

23rd percentile among DEF players

n = 87 eligible peers · sample 72

Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.

Progressive-action impact / 100 actions

-0.040

16th percentile among DEF players

n = 94 eligible peers · sample 161

Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.

Under-pressure impact / 100 actions

0.012

39th percentile among DEF players

n = 94 eligible peers · sample 161

Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.

Playing style

Safe Circulator

Position-relative style among eligible DEF players.

Style separation0.432

↓Progressive-pass rate (lower)

↑Pass difficulty (higher)

↓Positive forward distance / 100 passes (lower)

↓Long-pass rate (lower)

Pass difficulty+1.17 z
Under-pressure pass rate-1.64 z
Progressive-pass rate-0.76 z
Long-pass rate-0.61 z
Positive forward distance / 100 passes-0.43 z
Carry share of actions+0.27 z

Bars are z-scores relative to eligible positional peers, not percentiles or ratings. Distance-based style separation, not a probability. Smaller values mean the player lies nearer the boundary between the two archetypes.

Leverkusen Role Fit

DEF role

How closely a player's playing style matches this role. Compared with Bayer Leverkusen's observed DEF role.

Role distance · lower is closer0.730
CloserFarther

Strongest alignment

  • Progressive Pass Rate
  • Long Pass Rate
  • Positive Forward Distance Per 100 Passes

Largest difference

Pressure Pass Rate

limited sampleObserved across 1 matchesRole: 34 matches · 9 contributors

Role Fit measures how closely a player's observed playing style resembles Bayer Leverkusen's observed positional-role style. It does not predict transfer success or future performance.

Attacking impact

Impact of passes and carries

Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.

Reliable sample

Overall impact / 100 actions

-0.022

Passing impact / 100 passes

-0.072

Carrying impact / 100 carries

+0.040

Progressive-action impact / 100 actions

-0.040

Under-pressure impact / 100 actions

+0.012

161 actions · 89 passes · 72 carries · 57.8% increased attacking value

Campos visualization

Carry value map

Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.

Situational execution

Under pressure

3 attempts

Limited sample
Actual
100.0%
Pass difficulty
84.3%
Actual vs. expected passing
+15.7 pp

Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.

Progressive passing

10 attempts

Limited sample
Actual
40.0%
Pass difficulty
53.5%
Actual vs. expected passing
-13.5 pp

Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.

Long passing

11 attempts

Limited sample
Actual
72.7%
Pass difficulty
74.9%

Progression profile

Progressive-pass rate

10.8%

Pressure-pass rate

3.2%

Average forward distance

5.8 m

Positive forward distance / 100

774.2 m

Final-third entries / 100

4.3

Campos visualization

Pass map

Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.

Showing 1–93 of 93 passes

Pass subset

CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
Pass difficulty
99.3%
Outcome
Completed
Attacking impact
0.0000
Value before
0.0036
Value after
0.0036
Length
23.7 m
Context
Standard
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.

Similar playing styles

Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.

100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.

Limited sample: this player's style profile is based on 1 observed match, so nearest-neighbor rankings may be less stable.

#1 · Same position group

Marvin Friedrich

Borussia Mönchengladbach · Center Back

Style similarity

84.6 / 100

Pressure Pass RatePositive Forward Distance Per 100 PassesLong Pass Rate

Sample support: Limited · 1 limiting matches

Observed: 1 vs 2 matches

#2 · Same position group

Junior Castello Lukeba

RB Leipzig · Left Center Back

Style similarity

75.7 / 100

Actual vs. expected passing
-2.2 pp

Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.

Expected Completion RatePositive Forward Distance Per 100 PassesPressure Pass Rate

Sample support: Limited · 1 limiting matches

Observed: 1 vs 2 matches

#3 · Same position group

Mohamed Simakan

RB Leipzig · Right Center Back

Style similarity

75.6 / 100

Carry Share Of ActionsProgressive Pass RateExpected Completion Rate

Sample support: Limited · 1 limiting matches

Observed: 1 vs 2 matches

#4 · Same position group

Min Jae Kim

Bayern Munich · Left Center Back

Style similarity

74.3 / 100

Expected Completion RateLong Pass RateCarry Share Of Actions

Sample support: Limited · 1 limiting matches

Observed: 1 vs 2 matches

#5 · Same position group

Piero Martín Hincapié Reyna

Bayer Leverkusen · Left Center Back

Style similarity

73.8 / 100

Expected Completion RatePositive Forward Distance Per 100 PassesCarry Share Of Actions

Sample support: Limited · 1 limiting matches

Observed: 1 vs 25 matches

#6 · Same position group

Odilon Kossonou

Bayer Leverkusen · Right Center Back

Style similarity

72.2 / 100

Positive Forward Distance Per 100 PassesProgressive Pass RateLong Pass Rate

Sample support: Limited · 1 limiting matches

Observed: 1 vs 21 matches

Sample support uses the lower observed-match count in each pair. Lower coverage means a measured profile may vary more with additional matches; it never changes the style similarity or ranking.