Pass difficulty
67.3%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 51
requires 100 passes
Player profile
Marius Bülter
Hoffenheim · Left Wing Back · DEF
Matches observed2
Pass attempts51
Limited sampleActual completion
60.8%
31 completed passes
Pass difficulty
67.3%
How difficult a pass was to complete.
Actual vs. expected passing
-6.5 pp
-3.3 completions vs model expectation
Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.
Player intelligence
Position profile
DEF context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.
Insufficient eligible position metrics for a meaningful radar.
Style
Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.
Under-pressure pass rate
13.7%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 51
requires 100 passes
Progressive pass rate
37.3%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 51
requires 100 passes
Long-pass rate
29.4%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 51
requires 100 passes
Average forward distance
5.5 units
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 51
requires 100 passes
Positive forward distance / 100 passes
864.1 units
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 51
requires 100 passes
Final-third entries / 100 passes
5.882
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 51
requires 100 passes
Carry share of actions
39.8%
11th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 83
Progressive carry rate
12.1%
97th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 33
Progressive action rate
27.7%
100th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 83
Under-pressure action rate
18.1%
63rd percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 83
Shots / observed match
0.50 / match
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 1
requires 20 shots
xG / shot
3.7%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 1
requires 20 shots
Performance
Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.
Actual vs. expected passing
-6.5 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 51
requires 100 passes
Under-pressure completion above expected
-8.8 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 13 eligible peers · sample 7
requires 20 pressure passes
Progressive completion above expected
-13.4 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 17 eligible peers · sample 19
requires 20 progressive passes
Long-pass completion above expected
-24.7 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 21 eligible peers · sample 15
requires 20 long passes
Goals above expected
-0.037
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 1
requires 20 shots
Overall impact / 100 actions
-0.307
1st percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 83
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.686
0th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 50
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Carrying impact / 100 carries
0.267
97th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 33
Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
-0.248
1st percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 83
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
0.035
80th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 83
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Playing style
Direct Progressor
Position-relative style among eligible DEF players.
Style separation0.385
Progressive-pass rate (higher)
Pass difficulty (lower)
Positive forward distance / 100 passes (higher)
Long-pass rate (higher)
Pass difficulty-2.84 z
Under-pressure pass rate+0.26 z
Progressive-pass rate+2.90 z
Long-pass rate+2.03 z
Positive forward distance / 100 passes-0.06 z
Carry share of actions-1.51 z
Bars are z-scores relative to eligible positional peers, not percentiles or ratings. Distance-based style separation, not a probability. Smaller values mean the player lies nearer the boundary between the two archetypes.
Role Fit
DEF role
How closely a player's playing style matches this role. Compared with Bayer Leverkusen's observed DEF role.
#65 of 66Comparable external defensive candidatesRaw distance: 2.526
Lower distance means closer stylistic resemblance.
Closest stylistic dimensions
- Passes under pressure
- Forward distance per 100 passes
- Carry involvement
Largest stylistic difference
Progressive passing rate
limited sampleObserved across 2 matchesRole: 34 matches · 9 contributors
Role Fit compares observed playing style. It does not predict player quality, transfer success, or future performance.
Expected Goals
Non-penalty shooting
Goals above expected is descriptive for this observed sample, not a definitive finishing-skill rating.
Shots
1
1 matches observed
Goals
0
Total xG
0.0
Goals above expected
-0.0
xG / shot
0.0
0.0% goals / shot
Limited sample: fewer than 20 non-penalty shots.
Campos visualization
Shot map
Non-penalty xG is encoded by marker size and color. Preserved penalties have no modeled xG.
Shots1
Goals0
xG0.04
xG0.00 – 1.00
Green outline = GoalNormal outline = Non-goal
Attacking impact
Impact of passes and carries
Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.
Overall impact / 100 actions
-0.307
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.686
Carrying impact / 100 carries
+0.267
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
-0.248
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
+0.035
83 actions · 50 passes · 33 carries · 53.0% increased attacking value
Campos visualization
Carry value map
Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.
Situational execution
Under pressure
7 attempts
- Actual
- 42.9%
- Pass difficulty
- 51.7%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -8.8 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Progressive passing
19 attempts
- Actual
- 21.1%
- Pass difficulty
- 34.4%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -13.4 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Long passing
15 attempts
- Actual
- 6.7%
- Pass difficulty
- 31.3%
Progression profile
Progressive-pass rate
37.3%
Pressure-pass rate
13.7%
Average forward distance
5.5 m
Positive forward distance / 100
864.1 m
Final-third entries / 100
5.9
Campos visualization
Pass map
Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.
Showing 1–51 of 51 passes
CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
- Pass difficulty
- 97.0%
- Outcome
- Completed
- Attacking impact
- 0.0004
- Value before
- 0.0026
- Value after
- 0.0030
- Length
- 10.5 m
- Context
- Standard
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.
Similar playing styles
Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.
100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.
Limited sample: this player's style profile is based on 2 observed matches, so nearest-neighbor rankings may be less stable.
Style similarity
58.9 / 100
Expected Completion RateCarry Share Of ActionsProgressive Pass Rate
Sample support: Limited · 2 limiting matches
Observed: 2 vs 2 matches
Style similarity
58.3 / 100