Pass difficulty
71.4%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 90
requires 100 passes
Player profile
Jonas Föhrenbach
FC Heidenheim · Left Back · DEF
Matches observed2
Pass attempts90
Limited sampleActual completion
66.7%
60 completed passes
Pass difficulty
71.4%
How difficult a pass was to complete.
Actual vs. expected passing
-4.8 pp
-4.3 completions vs model expectation
Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.
Player intelligence
Position profile
DEF context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.
Insufficient eligible position metrics for a meaningful radar.
Style
Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.
Under-pressure pass rate
15.6%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 90
requires 100 passes
Progressive pass rate
30.0%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 90
requires 100 passes
Long-pass rate
22.2%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 90
requires 100 passes
Average forward distance
6.3 units
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 90
requires 100 passes
Positive forward distance / 100 passes
1067.6 units
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 90
requires 100 passes
Final-third entries / 100 passes
8.889
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 90
requires 100 passes
Carry share of actions
35.3%
3rd percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 133
Progressive carry rate
4.3%
75th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 47
Progressive action rate
21.1%
94th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 133
Under-pressure action rate
17.3%
57th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 133
Shots / observed match
0.00 / match
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 0
requires 20 shots
xG / shot
—
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 0
metric unavailable
Performance
Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.
Actual vs. expected passing
-4.8 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 90
requires 100 passes
Under-pressure completion above expected
-23.4 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 13 eligible peers · sample 14
requires 20 pressure passes
Progressive completion above expected
-2.5 pp
13th percentile among DEF players
n = 17 eligible peers · sample 27
Long-pass completion above expected
-2.2 pp
45th percentile among DEF players
n = 21 eligible peers · sample 20
Goals above expected
0.000
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 0
requires 20 shots
Overall impact / 100 actions
-0.174
2nd percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 133
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.290
2nd percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 86
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Carrying impact / 100 carries
0.038
21st percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 47
Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
-0.068
5th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 133
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
-0.077
0th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 133
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Playing style
Direct Progressor
Position-relative style among eligible DEF players.
Style separation0.387
Progressive-pass rate (higher)
Pass difficulty (lower)
Positive forward distance / 100 passes (higher)
Long-pass rate (higher)
Pass difficulty-2.14 z
Under-pressure pass rate+0.59 z
Progressive-pass rate+1.90 z
Long-pass rate+0.95 z
Positive forward distance / 100 passes+0.78 z
Carry share of actions-3.10 z
Bars are z-scores relative to eligible positional peers, not percentiles or ratings. Distance-based style separation, not a probability. Smaller values mean the player lies nearer the boundary between the two archetypes.
Role Fit
DEF role
How closely a player's playing style matches this role. Compared with Bayer Leverkusen's observed DEF role.
#64 of 66Comparable external defensive candidatesRaw distance: 2.417
Lower distance means closer stylistic resemblance.
Closest stylistic dimensions
- Passes under pressure
- Forward distance per 100 passes
- Long-pass rate
Largest stylistic difference
Carry involvement
limited sampleObserved across 2 matchesRole: 34 matches · 9 contributors
Role Fit compares observed playing style. It does not predict player quality, transfer success, or future performance.
Attacking impact
Impact of passes and carries
Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.
Overall impact / 100 actions
-0.174
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.290
Carrying impact / 100 carries
+0.038
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
-0.068
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
-0.077
133 actions · 86 passes · 47 carries · 45.9% increased attacking value
Campos visualization
Carry value map
Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.
Situational execution
Under pressure
14 attempts
- Actual
- 28.6%
- Pass difficulty
- 52.0%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -23.4 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Progressive passing
27 attempts
- Actual
- 48.1%
- Pass difficulty
- 50.7%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -2.5 pp
Long passing
20 attempts
- Actual
- 55.0%
- Pass difficulty
- 57.2%
- Actual vs. expected passing
Progression profile
Progressive-pass rate
30.0%
Pressure-pass rate
15.6%
Average forward distance
6.3 m
Positive forward distance / 100
1067.6 m
Final-third entries / 100
8.9
Campos visualization
Pass map
Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.
Showing 1–90 of 90 passes
CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
- Pass difficulty
- 99.3%
- Outcome
- Completed
- Attacking impact
- 0.0004
- Value before
- 0.0073
- Value after
- 0.0077
- Length
- 15.8 m
- Context
- Standard
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.
Similar playing styles
Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.
100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.
Limited sample: this player's style profile is based on 2 observed matches, so nearest-neighbor rankings may be less stable.
Style similarity
69.8 / 100
Expected Completion RateProgressive Pass RateLong Pass Rate
Sample support: Limited · 2 limiting matches
Observed: 2 vs 2 matches
Style similarity
60.5 / 100