Pass difficulty
86.3%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 54
requires 100 passes
Player profile
Stefan Bell
FSV Mainz 05 · Center Back · DEF
Matches observed1
Pass attempts54
Limited sampleActual completion
88.9%
48 completed passes
Pass difficulty
86.3%
How difficult a pass was to complete.
Actual vs. expected passing
+2.6 pp
+1.4 completions vs model expectation
Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.
Player intelligence
Position profile
DEF context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.
Insufficient eligible position metrics for a meaningful radar.
Style
Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.
Under-pressure pass rate
13.0%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 54
requires 100 passes
Progressive pass rate
9.3%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 54
requires 100 passes
Long-pass rate
13.0%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 54
requires 100 passes
Average forward distance
8.0 units
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 54
requires 100 passes
Positive forward distance / 100 passes
985.4 units
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 54
requires 100 passes
Final-third entries / 100 passes
3.704
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 54
requires 100 passes
Carry share of actions
45.1%
68th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 91
Progressive carry rate
0.0%
16th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 41
Progressive action rate
4.4%
11th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 91
Under-pressure action rate
11.0%
26th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 91
Shots / observed match
1.00 / match
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 1
requires 20 shots
xG / shot
4.1%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 1
requires 20 shots
Performance
Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.
Actual vs. expected passing
+2.6 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 54
requires 100 passes
Under-pressure completion above expected
+1.6 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 13 eligible peers · sample 7
requires 20 pressure passes
Progressive completion above expected
-7.9 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 17 eligible peers · sample 5
requires 20 progressive passes
Long-pass completion above expected
+5.4 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 21 eligible peers · sample 7
requires 20 long passes
Goals above expected
-0.041
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 1
requires 20 shots
Overall impact / 100 actions
0.001
35th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 91
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.020
56th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 50
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Carrying impact / 100 carries
0.026
14th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 41
Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
-0.001
45th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 91
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
-0.026
4th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 91
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Playing style
Safe Circulator
Position-relative style among eligible DEF players.
Style separation0.573
Progressive-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty (higher)
Positive forward distance / 100 passes (lower)
Long-pass rate (lower)
Pass difficulty+0.43 z
Under-pressure pass rate+0.12 z
Progressive-pass rate-0.96 z
Long-pass rate-0.44 z
Positive forward distance / 100 passes+0.44 z
Carry share of actions+0.39 z
Bars are z-scores relative to eligible positional peers, not percentiles or ratings. Distance-based style separation, not a probability. Smaller values mean the player lies nearer the boundary between the two archetypes.
Leverkusen Role Fit
DEF role
How closely a player's playing style matches this role. Compared with Bayer Leverkusen's observed DEF role.
Role distance · lower is closer0.603
CloserFarther
Strongest alignment
- Expected Completion Rate
- Pressure Pass Rate
- Progressive Pass Rate
Largest difference
Positive Forward Distance Per 100 Passes
limited sampleObserved across 1 matchesRole: 34 matches · 9 contributors
Role Fit measures how closely a player's observed playing style resembles Bayer Leverkusen's observed positional-role style. It does not predict transfer success or future performance.
Expected Goals
Non-penalty shooting
Goals above expected is descriptive for this observed sample, not a definitive finishing-skill rating.
Shots
1
1 matches observed
Goals
0
Total xG
0.0
Goals above expected
-0.0
xG / shot
0.0
0.0% goals / shot
Limited sample: fewer than 20 non-penalty shots.
Campos visualization
Shot map
Non-penalty xG is encoded by marker size and color. Preserved penalties have no modeled xG.
Shots1
Goals0
xG0.04
xG0.00 – 1.00
Green outline = GoalNormal outline = Non-goal
Attacking impact
Impact of passes and carries
Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.
Overall impact / 100 actions
+0.001
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.020
Carrying impact / 100 carries
+0.026
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
-0.001
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
-0.026
91 actions · 50 passes · 41 carries · 53.8% increased attacking value
Campos visualization
Carry value map
Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.
Situational execution
Under pressure
7 attempts
- Actual
- 57.1%
- Pass difficulty
- 55.6%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- +1.6 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Progressive passing
5 attempts
- Actual
- 40.0%
- Pass difficulty
- 47.9%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -7.9 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Long passing
7 attempts
- Actual
- 57.1%
- Pass difficulty
- 51.7%
Progression profile
Progressive-pass rate
9.3%
Pressure-pass rate
13.0%
Average forward distance
8.0 m
Positive forward distance / 100
985.4 m
Final-third entries / 100
3.7
Campos visualization
Pass map
Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.
Showing 1–54 of 54 passes
CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
- Pass difficulty
- 4.1%
- Outcome
- Incomplete
- Attacking impact
- —
- Value before
- —
- Value after
- —
- Length
- 49.1 m
- Context
- Standard
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.
Similar playing styles
Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.
100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.
Limited sample: this player's style profile is based on 1 observed match, so nearest-neighbor rankings may be less stable.
Style similarity
86.8 / 100
Pressure Pass RateExpected Completion RateProgressive Pass Rate
Sample support: Limited · 1 limiting matches
Observed: 1 vs 2 matches
Style similarity
82.8 / 100