Pass difficulty
84.4%
23rd percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 104
Player profile
Mats Hummels
Borussia Dortmund · Right Center Back · DEF
Matches observed2
Pass attempts104
Reliable sampleActual completion
83.7%
87 completed passes
Pass difficulty
84.4%
How difficult a pass was to complete.
Actual vs. expected passing
-0.7 pp
-0.7 completions vs model expectation
Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.
Player intelligence
Position profile
DEF context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.
Style
Performance
0–100 empirical percentiles among eligible same-position peers.
Style
Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.
Under-pressure pass rate
7.7%
14th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 104
Progressive pass rate
14.4%
64th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 104
Long-pass rate
32.7%
95th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 104
Average forward distance
7.8 units
86th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 104
Positive forward distance / 100 passes
1056.1 units
82nd percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 104
Final-third entries / 100 passes
9.615
64th percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 104
Carry share of actions
42.9%
28th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 170
Progressive carry rate
1.4%
40th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 73
Progressive action rate
8.8%
45th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 170
Under-pressure action rate
11.8%
30th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 170
Shots / observed match
0.00 / match
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 0
requires 20 shots
xG / shot
—
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 0
metric unavailable
Performance
Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.
Actual vs. expected passing
-0.7 pp
23rd percentile among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 104
Under-pressure completion above expected
+0.2 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 13 eligible peers · sample 8
requires 20 pressure passes
Progressive completion above expected
-12.2 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 17 eligible peers · sample 15
requires 20 progressive passes
Long-pass completion above expected
-4.2 pp
35th percentile among DEF players
n = 21 eligible peers · sample 34
Goals above expected
0.000
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 0
requires 20 shots
Overall impact / 100 actions
-0.026
20th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 170
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.085
28th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 97
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Carrying impact / 100 carries
0.053
37th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 73
Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
-0.048
11th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 170
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
0.007
30th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 170
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Playing style
Direct Progressor
Position-relative style among eligible DEF players.
Style separation0.342
Progressive-pass rate (higher)
Pass difficulty (lower)
Positive forward distance / 100 passes (higher)
Long-pass rate (higher)
Pass difficulty+0.09 z
Under-pressure pass rate-0.83 z
Progressive-pass rate-0.25 z
Long-pass rate+2.52 z
Positive forward distance / 100 passes+0.73 z
Carry share of actions-0.37 z
Bars are z-scores relative to eligible positional peers, not percentiles or ratings. Distance-based style separation, not a probability. Smaller values mean the player lies nearer the boundary between the two archetypes.
Leverkusen Role Fit
DEF role
How closely a player's playing style matches this role. Compared with Bayer Leverkusen's observed DEF role.
Role distance · lower is closer1.633
CloserFarther
Strongest alignment
- Progressive Pass Rate
- Expected Completion Rate
- Pressure Pass Rate
Largest difference
Long Pass Rate
limited sampleObserved across 2 matchesRole: 34 matches · 9 contributors
Role Fit measures how closely a player's observed playing style resembles Bayer Leverkusen's observed positional-role style. It does not predict transfer success or future performance.
Attacking impact
Impact of passes and carries
Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.
Overall impact / 100 actions
-0.026
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.085
Carrying impact / 100 carries
+0.053
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
-0.048
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
+0.007
170 actions · 97 passes · 73 carries · 57.1% increased attacking value
Campos visualization
Carry value map
Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.
Situational execution
Under pressure
8 attempts
- Actual
- 75.0%
- Pass difficulty
- 74.8%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- +0.2 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Progressive passing
15 attempts
- Actual
- 33.3%
- Pass difficulty
- 45.5%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -12.2 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Long passing
34 attempts
- Actual
- 67.6%
- Pass difficulty
- 71.8%
Progression profile
Progressive-pass rate
14.4%
Pressure-pass rate
7.7%
Average forward distance
7.8 m
Positive forward distance / 100
1056.1 m
Final-third entries / 100
9.6
Campos visualization
Pass map
Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.
Showing 1–104 of 104 passes
CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
- Pass difficulty
- 92.8%
- Outcome
- Completed
- Attacking impact
- 0.0024
- Value before
- 0.0052
- Value after
- 0.0076
- Length
- 18.8 m
- Context
- Standard
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.
Similar playing styles
Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.
100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.
Limited sample: this player's style profile is based on 2 observed matches, so nearest-neighbor rankings may be less stable.
Style similarity
74.7 / 100
Progressive Pass RateCarry Share Of ActionsLong Pass Rate
Sample support: Limited · 2 limiting matches
Observed: 2 vs 2 matches
Style similarity
70.4 / 100