Pass difficulty
87.2%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 62
requires 100 passes
Player profile
Manuel Gulde
Freiburg · Left Center Back · DEF
Matches observed2
Pass attempts62
Limited sampleActual completion
90.3%
56 completed passes
Pass difficulty
87.2%
How difficult a pass was to complete.
Actual vs. expected passing
+3.1 pp
+1.9 completions vs model expectation
Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.
Player intelligence
Position profile
DEF context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.
Insufficient eligible position metrics for a meaningful radar.
Style
Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.
Under-pressure pass rate
8.1%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 62
requires 100 passes
Progressive pass rate
12.9%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 62
requires 100 passes
Long-pass rate
24.2%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 62
requires 100 passes
Average forward distance
9.3 units
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 62
requires 100 passes
Positive forward distance / 100 passes
1134.7 units
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 62
requires 100 passes
Final-third entries / 100 passes
6.452
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 62
requires 100 passes
Carry share of actions
45.0%
67th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 109
Progressive carry rate
2.0%
47th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 49
Progressive action rate
8.3%
42nd percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 109
Under-pressure action rate
6.4%
10th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 109
Shots / observed match
1.00 / match
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 2
requires 20 shots
xG / shot
19.6%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 2
requires 20 shots
Performance
Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.
Actual vs. expected passing
+3.1 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 62
requires 100 passes
Under-pressure completion above expected
-4.3 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 13 eligible peers · sample 5
requires 20 pressure passes
Progressive completion above expected
-1.5 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 17 eligible peers · sample 8
requires 20 progressive passes
Long-pass completion above expected
-0.5 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 21 eligible peers · sample 15
requires 20 long passes
Goals above expected
0.609
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 2
requires 20 shots
Overall impact / 100 actions
0.034
69th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 109
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Passing impact / 100 passes
0.027
80th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 60
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Carrying impact / 100 carries
0.043
28th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 49
Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
-0.003
43rd percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 109
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
0.012
41st percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 109
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Playing style
Direct Progressor
Position-relative style among eligible DEF players.
Style separation0.170
Progressive-pass rate (higher)
Pass difficulty (lower)
Positive forward distance / 100 passes (higher)
Long-pass rate (higher)
Pass difficulty+0.58 z
Under-pressure pass rate-0.77 z
Progressive-pass rate-0.46 z
Long-pass rate+1.24 z
Positive forward distance / 100 passes+1.06 z
Carry share of actions+0.36 z
Bars are z-scores relative to eligible positional peers, not percentiles or ratings. Distance-based style separation, not a probability. Smaller values mean the player lies nearer the boundary between the two archetypes.
Leverkusen Role Fit
DEF role
How closely a player's playing style matches this role. Compared with Bayer Leverkusen's observed DEF role.
Role distance · lower is closer1.198
CloserFarther
Strongest alignment
- Expected Completion Rate
- Progressive Pass Rate
- Carry Share Of Actions
Largest difference
Long Pass Rate
limited sampleObserved across 2 matchesRole: 34 matches · 9 contributors
Role Fit measures how closely a player's observed playing style resembles Bayer Leverkusen's observed positional-role style. It does not predict transfer success or future performance.
Expected Goals
Non-penalty shooting
Goals above expected is descriptive for this observed sample, not a definitive finishing-skill rating.
Shots
2
2 matches observed
Goals
1
Total xG
0.4
Goals above expected
+0.6
xG / shot
0.2
50.0% goals / shot
Limited sample: fewer than 20 non-penalty shots.
Campos visualization
Shot map
Non-penalty xG is encoded by marker size and color. Preserved penalties have no modeled xG.
Shots2
Goals1
xG0.39
xG0.00 – 1.00
Header
Corner
Green outline = GoalNormal outline = Non-goal
Attacking impact
Impact of passes and carries
Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.
Overall impact / 100 actions
+0.034
Passing impact / 100 passes
+0.027
Carrying impact / 100 carries
+0.043
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
-0.003
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
+0.012
109 actions · 60 passes · 49 carries · 55.0% increased attacking value
Campos visualization
Carry value map
Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.
Situational execution
Under pressure
5 attempts
- Actual
- 80.0%
- Pass difficulty
- 84.3%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -4.3 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Progressive passing
8 attempts
- Actual
- 37.5%
- Pass difficulty
- 39.0%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -1.5 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Long passing
15 attempts
- Actual
- 66.7%
- Pass difficulty
- 67.1%
Progression profile
Progressive-pass rate
12.9%
Pressure-pass rate
8.1%
Average forward distance
9.3 m
Positive forward distance / 100
1134.7 m
Final-third entries / 100
6.5
Campos visualization
Pass map
Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.
Showing 1–62 of 62 passes
CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
- Pass difficulty
- 99.3%
- Outcome
- Completed
- Attacking impact
- -0.0026
- Value before
- 0.0160
- Value after
- 0.0134
- Length
- 23.9 m
- Context
- Standard
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.
Similar playing styles
Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.
100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.
Limited sample: this player's style profile is based on 2 observed matches, so nearest-neighbor rankings may be less stable.
Style similarity
78.6 / 100
Expected Completion RateProgressive Pass RateCarry Share Of Actions
Sample support: Limited · 1 limiting matches
Observed: 2 vs 1 matches
Style similarity
77.3 / 100