Pass difficulty
65.9%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 44
requires 100 passes
Player profile
Christopher Trimmel
Union Berlin · Right Wing Back · DEF
Matches observed2
Pass attempts44
Limited sampleActual completion
61.4%
27 completed passes
Pass difficulty
65.9%
How difficult a pass was to complete.
Actual vs. expected passing
-4.6 pp
-2.0 completions vs model expectation
Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.
Player intelligence
Position profile
DEF context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.
Insufficient eligible position metrics for a meaningful radar.
Style
Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.
Under-pressure pass rate
13.6%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 44
requires 100 passes
Progressive pass rate
34.1%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 44
requires 100 passes
Long-pass rate
27.3%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 44
requires 100 passes
Average forward distance
3.6 units
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 44
requires 100 passes
Positive forward distance / 100 passes
896.6 units
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 44
requires 100 passes
Final-third entries / 100 passes
15.909
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 44
requires 100 passes
Carry share of actions
34.8%
1st percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 66
Progressive carry rate
4.3%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 23
requires 29 carries
Progressive action rate
22.7%
98th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 66
Under-pressure action rate
15.2%
46th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 66
Shots / observed match
0.00 / match
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 0
requires 20 shots
xG / shot
—
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 0
metric unavailable
Performance
Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.
Actual vs. expected passing
-4.6 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 44
requires 100 passes
Under-pressure completion above expected
+10.6 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 13 eligible peers · sample 6
requires 20 pressure passes
Progressive completion above expected
-10.0 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 17 eligible peers · sample 15
requires 20 progressive passes
Long-pass completion above expected
-5.3 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 21 eligible peers · sample 12
requires 20 long passes
Goals above expected
0.000
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 0
requires 20 shots
Overall impact / 100 actions
-0.368
0th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 66
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.593
1st percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 43
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Carrying impact / 100 carries
0.053
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 23
requires 29 carries
Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
-0.268
0th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 66
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
0.029
69th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 66
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Playing style
Archetype unavailable
Limited sample for archetype analysis: requires 50 passes.
Archetypes describe outfield playing tendencies, not quality, ability, or rank.
Role Fit — Bayer Leverkusen
Role Fit unavailable
Role Fit requires at least 50 passes and 29 carries in the product sample.
Attacking impact
Impact of passes and carries
Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.
Overall impact / 100 actions
-0.368
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.593
Carrying impact / 100 carries
+0.053
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
-0.268
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
+0.029
66 actions · 43 passes · 23 carries · 40.9% increased attacking value
Campos visualization
Carry value map
Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.
Situational execution
Under pressure
6 attempts
- Actual
- 66.7%
- Pass difficulty
- 56.1%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- +10.6 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Progressive passing
15 attempts
- Actual
- 26.7%
- Pass difficulty
- 36.6%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -10.0 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Long passing
12 attempts
- Actual
- 25.0%
- Pass difficulty
- 30.3%
Progression profile
Progressive-pass rate
34.1%
Pressure-pass rate
13.6%
Average forward distance
3.6 m
Positive forward distance / 100
896.6 m
Final-third entries / 100
15.9
Campos visualization
Pass map
Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.
Showing 1–44 of 44 passes
CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
- Pass difficulty
- 88.2%
- Outcome
- Completed
- Attacking impact
- 0.0041
- Value before
- 0.0161
- Value after
- 0.0203
- Length
- 16.0 m
- Context
- Progressive
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.
Similar playing styles
Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.
100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.
Playing-style similarity unavailable
V3.3B similarity requires an outfield player with at least 50 passes and 29 carries.
Sample support uses the lower observed-match count in each pair. Lower coverage means a measured profile may vary more with additional matches; it never changes the style similarity or ranking.