Pass difficulty
72.1%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 38
requires 100 passes
Player profile
Ermedin Demirović
Augsburg · Left Center Forward · FWD
Matches observed2
Pass attempts38
Limited sampleActual completion
63.2%
24 completed passes
Pass difficulty
72.1%
How difficult a pass was to complete.
Actual vs. expected passing
-8.9 pp
-3.4 completions vs model expectation
Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.
Player intelligence
Position profile
FWD context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.
Insufficient eligible position metrics for a meaningful radar.
Style
Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.
Under-pressure pass rate
50.0%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 38
requires 100 passes
Progressive pass rate
23.7%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 38
requires 100 passes
Long-pass rate
2.6%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 38
requires 100 passes
Average forward distance
2.5 units
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 38
requires 100 passes
Positive forward distance / 100 passes
567.4 units
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 38
requires 100 passes
Final-third entries / 100 passes
13.158
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 38
requires 100 passes
Carry share of actions
47.5%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 61
requires 63 actions
Progressive carry rate
10.3%
74th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 29
Progressive action rate
16.4%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 61
requires 63 actions
Under-pressure action rate
59.0%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 61
requires 63 actions
Shots / observed match
3.00 / match
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 2 eligible peers · sample 6
requires 20 shots
xG / shot
10.3%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 2 eligible peers · sample 6
requires 20 shots
Performance
Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.
Actual vs. expected passing
-8.9 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 38
requires 100 passes
Under-pressure completion above expected
-9.4 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 19
requires 20 pressure passes
Progressive completion above expected
-12.7 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 9
requires 20 progressive passes
Long-pass completion above expected
+0.6 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 1 eligible peers · sample 1
requires 20 long passes
Goals above expected
-0.620
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 2 eligible peers · sample 6
requires 20 shots
Overall impact / 100 actions
-0.331
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 61
requires 63 actions
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.603
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 19 eligible peers · sample 32
requires 36 passes
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Carrying impact / 100 carries
-0.030
0th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 29
Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
-0.012
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 61
requires 63 actions
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
-0.179
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 61
requires 63 actions
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Playing style
Archetype unavailable
Limited sample for archetype analysis: requires 50 passes.
Archetypes describe outfield playing tendencies, not quality, ability, or rank.
Role Fit — Bayer Leverkusen
Role Fit unavailable
Role Fit requires at least 50 passes and 29 carries in the product sample.
Expected Goals
Non-penalty shooting
Goals above expected is descriptive for this observed sample, not a definitive finishing-skill rating.
Shots
6
2 matches observed
Goals
0
Total xG
0.6
Goals above expected
-0.6
xG / shot
0.1
0.0% goals / shot
Limited sample: fewer than 20 non-penalty shots.
Campos visualization
Shot map
Non-penalty xG is encoded by marker size and color. Preserved penalties have no modeled xG.
Shots6
Goals0
xG0.62
xG0.00 – 1.00
Foot
Corner
Green outline = GoalNormal outline = Non-goal
Attacking impact
Impact of passes and carries
Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.
Overall impact / 100 actions
-0.331
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.603
Carrying impact / 100 carries
-0.030
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
-0.012
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
-0.179
61 actions · 32 passes · 29 carries · 45.9% increased attacking value
Campos visualization
Carry value map
Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.
Situational execution
Under pressure
19 attempts
- Actual
- 52.6%
- Pass difficulty
- 62.0%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -9.4 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Progressive passing
9 attempts
- Actual
- 33.3%
- Pass difficulty
- 46.0%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -12.7 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Long passing
1 attempts
- Actual
- 100.0%
- Pass difficulty
- 99.4%
Progression profile
Progressive-pass rate
23.7%
Pressure-pass rate
50.0%
Average forward distance
2.5 m
Positive forward distance / 100
567.4 m
Final-third entries / 100
13.2
Campos visualization
Pass map
Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.
Showing 1–38 of 38 passes
CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
- Pass difficulty
- 45.1%
- Outcome
- Completed
- Attacking impact
- 0.0009
- Value before
- 0.0022
- Value after
- 0.0030
- Length
- 16.9 m
- Context
- Under pressure
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.
Similar playing styles
Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.
100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.
Playing-style similarity unavailable
V3.3B similarity requires an outfield player with at least 50 passes and 29 carries.
Sample support uses the lower observed-match count in each pair. Lower coverage means a measured profile may vary more with additional matches; it never changes the style similarity or ranking.