Pass difficulty
84.4%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 39
requires 100 passes
Player profile
Luca Pfeiffer
Darmstadt 98 · Right Center Forward · FWD
Matches observed2
Pass attempts39
Limited sampleActual completion
84.6%
33 completed passes
Pass difficulty
84.4%
How difficult a pass was to complete.
Actual vs. expected passing
+0.3 pp
+0.1 completions vs model expectation
Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.
Player intelligence
Position profile
FWD context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.
Insufficient eligible position metrics for a meaningful radar.
Style
Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.
Under-pressure pass rate
17.9%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 39
requires 100 passes
Progressive pass rate
7.7%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 39
requires 100 passes
Long-pass rate
5.1%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 39
requires 100 passes
Average forward distance
-1.8 units
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 39
requires 100 passes
Positive forward distance / 100 passes
501.5 units
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 39
requires 100 passes
Final-third entries / 100 passes
7.692
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 39
requires 100 passes
Carry share of actions
41.0%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 61
requires 63 actions
Progressive carry rate
4.0%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 25
requires 29 carries
Progressive action rate
4.9%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 61
requires 63 actions
Under-pressure action rate
32.8%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 61
requires 63 actions
Shots / observed match
1.50 / match
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 2 eligible peers · sample 3
requires 20 shots
xG / shot
8.8%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 2 eligible peers · sample 3
requires 20 shots
Performance
Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.
Actual vs. expected passing
+0.3 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 39
requires 100 passes
Under-pressure completion above expected
-1.8 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 7
requires 20 pressure passes
Progressive completion above expected
+20.0 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 3
requires 20 progressive passes
Long-pass completion above expected
+47.3 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 1 eligible peers · sample 2
requires 20 long passes
Goals above expected
-0.265
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 2 eligible peers · sample 3
requires 20 shots
Overall impact / 100 actions
-0.024
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 61
requires 63 actions
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.161
78th percentile among FWD players
n = 19 eligible peers · sample 36
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Carrying impact / 100 carries
0.173
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 25
requires 29 carries
Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
0.035
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 61
requires 63 actions
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
0.033
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 61
requires 63 actions
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Playing style
Archetype unavailable
Limited sample for archetype analysis: requires 50 passes.
Archetypes describe outfield playing tendencies, not quality, ability, or rank.
Role Fit — Bayer Leverkusen
Role Fit unavailable
Role Fit requires at least 50 passes and 29 carries in the product sample.
Expected Goals
Non-penalty shooting
Goals above expected is descriptive for this observed sample, not a definitive finishing-skill rating.
Shots
3
1 matches observed
Goals
0
Total xG
0.3
Goals above expected
-0.3
xG / shot
0.1
0.0% goals / shot
Limited sample: fewer than 20 non-penalty shots.
Campos visualization
Shot map
Non-penalty xG is encoded by marker size and color. Preserved penalties have no modeled xG.
Shots3
Goals0
xG0.27
xG0.00 – 1.00
Green outline = GoalNormal outline = Non-goal
Attacking impact
Impact of passes and carries
Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.
Overall impact / 100 actions
-0.024
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.161
Carrying impact / 100 carries
+0.173
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
+0.035
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
+0.033
61 actions · 36 passes · 25 carries · 39.3% increased attacking value
Campos visualization
Carry value map
Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.
Situational execution
Under pressure
7 attempts
- Actual
- 57.1%
- Pass difficulty
- 59.0%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -1.8 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Progressive passing
3 attempts
- Actual
- 66.7%
- Pass difficulty
- 46.6%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- +20.0 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Long passing
2 attempts
- Actual
- 100.0%
- Pass difficulty
- 52.7%
Progression profile
Progressive-pass rate
7.7%
Pressure-pass rate
17.9%
Average forward distance
-1.8 m
Positive forward distance / 100
501.5 m
Final-third entries / 100
7.7
Campos visualization
Pass map
Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.
Showing 1–39 of 39 passes
CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
- Pass difficulty
- 99.3%
- Outcome
- Completed
- Attacking impact
- -0.0054
- Value before
- 0.0135
- Value after
- 0.0082
- Length
- 22.4 m
- Context
- Standard
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.
Similar playing styles
Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.
100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.
Playing-style similarity unavailable
V3.3B similarity requires an outfield player with at least 50 passes and 29 carries.
Sample support uses the lower observed-match count in each pair. Lower coverage means a measured profile may vary more with additional matches; it never changes the style similarity or ranking.