Pass difficulty
88.7%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 37
requires 100 passes
Player profile
Leonidas Stergiou
VfB Stuttgart · Right Back · DEF
Matches observed2
Pass attempts37
Limited sampleActual completion
91.9%
34 completed passes
Pass difficulty
88.7%
How difficult a pass was to complete.
Actual vs. expected passing
+3.2 pp
+1.2 completions vs model expectation
Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.
Player intelligence
Position profile
DEF context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.
Insufficient eligible position metrics for a meaningful radar.
Style
Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.
Under-pressure pass rate
8.1%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 37
requires 100 passes
Progressive pass rate
8.1%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 37
requires 100 passes
Long-pass rate
8.1%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 37
requires 100 passes
Average forward distance
3.2 units
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 37
requires 100 passes
Positive forward distance / 100 passes
680.5 units
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 37
requires 100 passes
Final-third entries / 100 passes
8.108
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 37
requires 100 passes
Carry share of actions
48.5%
97th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 66
Progressive carry rate
3.1%
60th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 32
Progressive action rate
3.0%
3rd percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 66
Under-pressure action rate
12.1%
33rd percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 66
Shots / observed match
0.50 / match
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 1
requires 20 shots
xG / shot
3.0%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 1
requires 20 shots
Performance
Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.
Actual vs. expected passing
+3.2 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 37
requires 100 passes
Under-pressure completion above expected
-30.4 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 13 eligible peers · sample 3
requires 20 pressure passes
Progressive completion above expected
+32.6 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 17 eligible peers · sample 3
requires 20 progressive passes
Long-pass completion above expected
+8.0 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 21 eligible peers · sample 3
requires 20 long passes
Goals above expected
-0.030
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 1
requires 20 shots
Overall impact / 100 actions
0.195
97th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 66
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Passing impact / 100 passes
0.302
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 34
requires 36 passes
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Carrying impact / 100 carries
0.081
67th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 32
Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
0.201
97th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 66
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
-0.013
9th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 66
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Playing style
Archetype unavailable
Limited sample for archetype analysis: requires 50 passes.
Archetypes describe outfield playing tendencies, not quality, ability, or rank.
Role Fit — Bayer Leverkusen
Role Fit unavailable
Role Fit requires at least 50 passes and 29 carries in the product sample.
Expected Goals
Non-penalty shooting
Goals above expected is descriptive for this observed sample, not a definitive finishing-skill rating.
Shots
1
1 matches observed
Goals
0
Total xG
0.0
Goals above expected
-0.0
xG / shot
0.0
0.0% goals / shot
Limited sample: fewer than 20 non-penalty shots.
Campos visualization
Shot map
Non-penalty xG is encoded by marker size and color. Preserved penalties have no modeled xG.
Shots1
Goals0
xG0.03
xG0.00 – 1.00
Green outline = GoalNormal outline = Non-goal
Attacking impact
Impact of passes and carries
Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.
Overall impact / 100 actions
+0.195
Passing impact / 100 passes
+0.302
Carrying impact / 100 carries
+0.081
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
+0.201
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
-0.013
66 actions · 34 passes · 32 carries · 48.5% increased attacking value
Campos visualization
Carry value map
Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.
Situational execution
Under pressure
3 attempts
- Actual
- 66.7%
- Pass difficulty
- 97.1%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -30.4 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Progressive passing
3 attempts
- Actual
- 66.7%
- Pass difficulty
- 34.0%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- +32.6 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Long passing
3 attempts
- Actual
- 66.7%
- Pass difficulty
- 58.7%
Progression profile
Progressive-pass rate
8.1%
Pressure-pass rate
8.1%
Average forward distance
3.2 m
Positive forward distance / 100
680.5 m
Final-third entries / 100
8.1
Campos visualization
Pass map
Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.
Showing 1–37 of 37 passes
CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
- Pass difficulty
- 98.8%
- Outcome
- Completed
- Attacking impact
- 0.0002
- Value before
- 0.0135
- Value after
- 0.0137
- Length
- 9.8 m
- Context
- Standard
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.
Similar playing styles
Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.
100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.
Playing-style similarity unavailable
V3.3B similarity requires an outfield player with at least 50 passes and 29 carries.
Sample support uses the lower observed-match count in each pair. Lower coverage means a measured profile may vary more with additional matches; it never changes the style similarity or ranking.