Pass difficulty
91.4%
Unavailable among MID players
n = 13 eligible peers · sample 43
requires 100 passes
Player profile
Gustavo Adolfo Puerta Molano
Bayer Leverkusen · Left Defensive Midfield · MID
Matches observed7
Pass attempts43
Limited sampleActual completion
95.3%
41 completed passes
Pass difficulty
91.4%
How difficult a pass was to complete.
Actual vs. expected passing
+4.0 pp
+1.7 completions vs model expectation
Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.
Player intelligence
Position profile
MID context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.
Insufficient eligible position metrics for a meaningful radar.
Style
Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.
Under-pressure pass rate
7.0%
Unavailable among MID players
n = 13 eligible peers · sample 43
requires 100 passes
Progressive pass rate
7.0%
Unavailable among MID players
n = 13 eligible peers · sample 43
requires 100 passes
Long-pass rate
14.0%
Unavailable among MID players
n = 13 eligible peers · sample 43
requires 100 passes
Average forward distance
3.2 units
Unavailable among MID players
n = 13 eligible peers · sample 43
requires 100 passes
Positive forward distance / 100 passes
582.6 units
Unavailable among MID players
n = 13 eligible peers · sample 43
requires 100 passes
Final-third entries / 100 passes
9.302
Unavailable among MID players
n = 13 eligible peers · sample 43
requires 100 passes
Carry share of actions
46.8%
57th percentile among MID players
n = 61 eligible peers · sample 79
Progressive carry rate
2.7%
42nd percentile among MID players
n = 66 eligible peers · sample 37
Progressive action rate
5.1%
30th percentile among MID players
n = 61 eligible peers · sample 79
Under-pressure action rate
13.9%
3rd percentile among MID players
n = 61 eligible peers · sample 79
Shots / observed match
0.29 / match
Unavailable among MID players
n = 5 eligible peers · sample 2
requires 20 shots
xG / shot
3.6%
Unavailable among MID players
n = 5 eligible peers · sample 2
requires 20 shots
Performance
Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.
Actual vs. expected passing
+4.0 pp
Unavailable among MID players
n = 13 eligible peers · sample 43
requires 100 passes
Under-pressure completion above expected
+13.8 pp
Unavailable among MID players
n = 10 eligible peers · sample 3
requires 20 pressure passes
Progressive completion above expected
+14.2 pp
Unavailable among MID players
n = 9 eligible peers · sample 3
requires 20 progressive passes
Long-pass completion above expected
+10.5 pp
Unavailable among MID players
n = 9 eligible peers · sample 6
requires 20 long passes
Goals above expected
-0.072
Unavailable among MID players
n = 5 eligible peers · sample 2
requires 20 shots
Overall impact / 100 actions
0.034
68th percentile among MID players
n = 61 eligible peers · sample 79
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Passing impact / 100 passes
0.014
86th percentile among MID players
n = 58 eligible peers · sample 42
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Carrying impact / 100 carries
0.057
25th percentile among MID players
n = 66 eligible peers · sample 37
Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
0.007
40th percentile among MID players
n = 61 eligible peers · sample 79
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
0.051
73rd percentile among MID players
n = 61 eligible peers · sample 79
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Playing style
Archetype unavailable
Limited sample for archetype analysis: requires 50 passes.
Archetypes describe outfield playing tendencies, not quality, ability, or rank.
Role Fit — Bayer Leverkusen
Role Fit unavailable
Role Fit requires at least 50 passes and 29 carries in the product sample.
Expected Goals
Non-penalty shooting
Goals above expected is descriptive for this observed sample, not a definitive finishing-skill rating.
Shots
2
2 matches observed
Goals
0
Total xG
0.1
Goals above expected
-0.1
xG / shot
0.0
0.0% goals / shot
Limited sample: fewer than 20 non-penalty shots.
Campos visualization
Shot map
Non-penalty xG is encoded by marker size and color. Preserved penalties have no modeled xG.
Shots2
Goals0
xG0.07
xG0.00 – 1.00
Foot
Corner
Green outline = GoalNormal outline = Non-goal
Attacking impact
Impact of passes and carries
Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.
Overall impact / 100 actions
+0.034
Passing impact / 100 passes
+0.014
Carrying impact / 100 carries
+0.057
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
+0.007
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
+0.051
79 actions · 42 passes · 37 carries · 51.9% increased attacking value
Campos visualization
Carry value map
Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.
Situational execution
Under pressure
3 attempts
- Actual
- 100.0%
- Pass difficulty
- 86.2%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- +13.8 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Progressive passing
3 attempts
- Actual
- 66.7%
- Pass difficulty
- 52.5%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- +14.2 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Long passing
6 attempts
- Actual
- 83.3%
- Pass difficulty
- 72.8%
Progression profile
Progressive-pass rate
7.0%
Pressure-pass rate
7.0%
Average forward distance
3.2 m
Positive forward distance / 100
582.6 m
Final-third entries / 100
9.3
Campos visualization
Pass map
Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.
Showing 1–43 of 43 passes
CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
- Pass difficulty
- 99.4%
- Outcome
- Completed
- Attacking impact
- -0.0030
- Value before
- 0.0280
- Value after
- 0.0250
- Length
- 14.3 m
- Context
- Standard
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.
Similar playing styles
Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.
100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.
Playing-style similarity unavailable
V3.3B similarity requires an outfield player with at least 50 passes and 29 carries.
Sample support uses the lower observed-match count in each pair. Lower coverage means a measured profile may vary more with additional matches; it never changes the style similarity or ranking.