Pass difficulty
89.5%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 42
requires 100 passes
Player profile
Robert Skov
Hoffenheim · Right Wing Back · DEF
Matches observed1
Pass attempts42
Limited sampleActual completion
88.1%
37 completed passes
Pass difficulty
89.5%
How difficult a pass was to complete.
Actual vs. expected passing
-1.4 pp
-0.6 completions vs model expectation
Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.
Player intelligence
Position profile
DEF context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.
Insufficient eligible position metrics for a meaningful radar.
Style
Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.
Under-pressure pass rate
16.7%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 42
requires 100 passes
Progressive pass rate
16.7%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 42
requires 100 passes
Long-pass rate
21.4%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 42
requires 100 passes
Average forward distance
-3.5 units
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 42
requires 100 passes
Positive forward distance / 100 passes
442.4 units
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 42
requires 100 passes
Final-third entries / 100 passes
4.762
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 42
requires 100 passes
Carry share of actions
48.1%
96th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 79
Progressive carry rate
15.8%
99th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 38
Progressive action rate
16.5%
88th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 79
Under-pressure action rate
34.2%
100th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 79
Shots / observed match
2.00 / match
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 2
requires 20 shots
xG / shot
7.2%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 2
requires 20 shots
Performance
Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.
Actual vs. expected passing
-1.4 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 42
requires 100 passes
Under-pressure completion above expected
-0.4 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 13 eligible peers · sample 7
requires 20 pressure passes
Progressive completion above expected
-12.1 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 17 eligible peers · sample 7
requires 20 progressive passes
Long-pass completion above expected
-8.5 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 21 eligible peers · sample 9
requires 20 long passes
Goals above expected
-0.144
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 2
requires 20 shots
Overall impact / 100 actions
0.025
57th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 79
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.224
12th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 41
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Carrying impact / 100 carries
0.294
98th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 38
Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
0.037
69th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 79
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
0.172
99th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 79
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Playing style
Archetype unavailable
Limited sample for archetype analysis: requires 50 passes.
Archetypes describe outfield playing tendencies, not quality, ability, or rank.
Role Fit — Bayer Leverkusen
Role Fit unavailable
Role Fit requires at least 50 passes and 29 carries in the product sample.
Expected Goals
Non-penalty shooting
Goals above expected is descriptive for this observed sample, not a definitive finishing-skill rating.
Shots
2
1 matches observed
Goals
0
Total xG
0.1
Goals above expected
-0.1
xG / shot
0.1
0.0% goals / shot
Limited sample: fewer than 20 non-penalty shots.
Campos visualization
Shot map
Non-penalty xG is encoded by marker size and color. Preserved penalties have no modeled xG.
Shots2
Goals0
xG0.14
xG0.00 – 1.00
Green outline = GoalNormal outline = Non-goal
Attacking impact
Impact of passes and carries
Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.
Overall impact / 100 actions
+0.025
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.224
Carrying impact / 100 carries
+0.294
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
+0.037
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
+0.172
79 actions · 41 passes · 38 carries · 46.8% increased attacking value
Campos visualization
Carry value map
Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.
Situational execution
Under pressure
7 attempts
- Actual
- 85.7%
- Pass difficulty
- 86.1%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -0.4 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Progressive passing
7 attempts
- Actual
- 42.9%
- Pass difficulty
- 55.0%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -12.1 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Long passing
9 attempts
- Actual
- 77.8%
- Pass difficulty
- 86.3%
Progression profile
Progressive-pass rate
16.7%
Pressure-pass rate
16.7%
Average forward distance
-3.5 m
Positive forward distance / 100
442.4 m
Final-third entries / 100
4.8
Campos visualization
Pass map
Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.
Showing 1–42 of 42 passes
CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
- Pass difficulty
- 99.4%
- Outcome
- Completed
- Attacking impact
- 0.0037
- Value before
- 0.0058
- Value after
- 0.0095
- Length
- 39.3 m
- Context
- Standard
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.
Similar playing styles
Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.
100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.
Playing-style similarity unavailable
V3.3B similarity requires an outfield player with at least 50 passes and 29 carries.
Sample support uses the lower observed-match count in each pair. Lower coverage means a measured profile may vary more with additional matches; it never changes the style similarity or ranking.