Pass difficulty
76.0%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 49
requires 100 passes
Player profile
Matej Maglica
Darmstadt 98 · Left Center Back · DEF
Matches observed2
Pass attempts49
Limited sampleActual completion
71.4%
35 completed passes
Pass difficulty
76.0%
How difficult a pass was to complete.
Actual vs. expected passing
-4.6 pp
-2.3 completions vs model expectation
Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.
Player intelligence
Position profile
DEF context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.
Insufficient eligible position metrics for a meaningful radar.
Style
Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.
Under-pressure pass rate
8.2%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 49
requires 100 passes
Progressive pass rate
22.4%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 49
requires 100 passes
Long-pass rate
22.4%
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 49
requires 100 passes
Average forward distance
13.6 units
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 49
requires 100 passes
Positive forward distance / 100 passes
1561.6 units
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 49
requires 100 passes
Final-third entries / 100 passes
12.245
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 49
requires 100 passes
Carry share of actions
44.0%
57th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 75
Progressive carry rate
0.0%
16th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 33
Progressive action rate
10.7%
57th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 75
Under-pressure action rate
9.3%
16th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 75
Shots / observed match
0.00 / match
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 0
requires 20 shots
xG / shot
—
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 0
metric unavailable
Performance
Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.
Actual vs. expected passing
-4.6 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 23 eligible peers · sample 49
requires 100 passes
Under-pressure completion above expected
-4.0 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 13 eligible peers · sample 4
requires 20 pressure passes
Progressive completion above expected
-9.7 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 17 eligible peers · sample 11
requires 20 progressive passes
Long-pass completion above expected
-17.5 pp
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 21 eligible peers · sample 11
requires 20 long passes
Goals above expected
0.000
Unavailable among DEF players
n = 4 eligible peers · sample 0
requires 20 shots
Overall impact / 100 actions
-0.110
6th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 75
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.218
13th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 42
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Carrying impact / 100 carries
0.028
16th percentile among DEF players
n = 87 eligible peers · sample 33
Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
-0.055
8th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 75
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
-0.006
13th percentile among DEF players
n = 94 eligible peers · sample 75
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Playing style
Archetype unavailable
Limited sample for archetype analysis: requires 50 passes.
Archetypes describe outfield playing tendencies, not quality, ability, or rank.
Role Fit — Bayer Leverkusen
Role Fit unavailable
Role Fit requires at least 50 passes and 29 carries in the product sample.
Attacking impact
Impact of passes and carries
Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.
Overall impact / 100 actions
-0.110
Passing impact / 100 passes
-0.218
Carrying impact / 100 carries
+0.028
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
-0.055
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
-0.006
75 actions · 42 passes · 33 carries · 49.3% increased attacking value
Campos visualization
Carry value map
Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.
Situational execution
Under pressure
4 attempts
- Actual
- 50.0%
- Pass difficulty
- 54.0%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -4.0 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Progressive passing
11 attempts
- Actual
- 27.3%
- Pass difficulty
- 36.9%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- -9.7 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Long passing
11 attempts
- Actual
- 36.4%
- Pass difficulty
- 53.8%
Progression profile
Progressive-pass rate
22.4%
Pressure-pass rate
8.2%
Average forward distance
13.6 m
Positive forward distance / 100
1561.6 m
Final-third entries / 100
12.2
Campos visualization
Pass map
Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.
Showing 1–49 of 49 passes
CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
- Pass difficulty
- 81.5%
- Outcome
- Completed
- Attacking impact
- 0.0042
- Value before
- 0.0054
- Value after
- 0.0096
- Length
- 24.8 m
- Context
- Progressive
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.
Similar playing styles
Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.
100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.
Playing-style similarity unavailable
V3.3B similarity requires an outfield player with at least 50 passes and 29 carries.
Sample support uses the lower observed-match count in each pair. Lower coverage means a measured profile may vary more with additional matches; it never changes the style similarity or ranking.