Pass difficulty
81.1%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 45
requires 100 passes
Player profile
Deniz Undav
VfB Stuttgart · Right Center Forward · FWD
Matches observed2
Pass attempts45
Limited sampleActual completion
88.9%
40 completed passes
Pass difficulty
81.1%
How difficult a pass was to complete.
Actual vs. expected passing
+7.8 pp
+3.5 completions vs model expectation
Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.
Player intelligence
Position profile
FWD context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.
Insufficient eligible position metrics for a meaningful radar.
Style
Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.
Under-pressure pass rate
26.7%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 45
requires 100 passes
Progressive pass rate
11.1%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 45
requires 100 passes
Long-pass rate
6.7%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 45
requires 100 passes
Average forward distance
0.7 units
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 45
requires 100 passes
Positive forward distance / 100 passes
439.8 units
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 45
requires 100 passes
Final-third entries / 100 passes
8.889
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 45
requires 100 passes
Carry share of actions
52.7%
84th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 91
Progressive carry rate
8.3%
68th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 48
Progressive action rate
9.9%
26th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 91
Under-pressure action rate
35.2%
37th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 91
Shots / observed match
4.50 / match
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 2 eligible peers · sample 9
requires 20 shots
xG / shot
11.8%
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 2 eligible peers · sample 9
requires 20 shots
Performance
Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.
Actual vs. expected passing
+7.8 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 45
requires 100 passes
Under-pressure completion above expected
+13.0 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 12
requires 20 pressure passes
Progressive completion above expected
+62.7 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 3 eligible peers · sample 5
requires 20 progressive passes
Long-pass completion above expected
+32.9 pp
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 1 eligible peers · sample 3
requires 20 long passes
Goals above expected
-0.060
Unavailable among FWD players
n = 2 eligible peers · sample 9
requires 20 shots
Overall impact / 100 actions
0.273
95th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 91
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Passing impact / 100 passes
0.310
100th percentile among FWD players
n = 19 eligible peers · sample 43
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Carrying impact / 100 carries
0.241
74th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 48
Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
0.214
89th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 91
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
0.096
89th percentile among FWD players
n = 20 eligible peers · sample 91
Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.
Playing style
Archetype unavailable
Limited sample for archetype analysis: requires 50 passes.
Archetypes describe outfield playing tendencies, not quality, ability, or rank.
Role Fit — Bayer Leverkusen
Role Fit unavailable
Role Fit requires at least 50 passes and 29 carries in the product sample.
Expected Goals
Non-penalty shooting
Goals above expected is descriptive for this observed sample, not a definitive finishing-skill rating.
Shots
9
2 matches observed
Goals
1
Total xG
1.1
Goals above expected
-0.1
xG / shot
0.1
11.1% goals / shot
Limited sample: fewer than 20 non-penalty shots.
Campos visualization
Shot map
Non-penalty xG is encoded by marker size and color. Preserved penalties have no modeled xG.
Shots9
Goals1
xG1.06
xG0.00 – 1.00
Foot
Corner
Green outline = GoalNormal outline = Non-goal
Attacking impact
Impact of passes and carries
Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.
Overall impact / 100 actions
+0.273
Passing impact / 100 passes
+0.310
Carrying impact / 100 carries
+0.241
Progressive-action impact / 100 actions
+0.214
Under-pressure impact / 100 actions
+0.096
91 actions · 43 passes · 48 carries · 60.4% increased attacking value
Campos visualization
Carry value map
Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.
Situational execution
Under pressure
12 attempts
- Actual
- 91.7%
- Pass difficulty
- 78.7%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- +13.0 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Progressive passing
5 attempts
- Actual
- 100.0%
- Pass difficulty
- 37.3%
- Actual vs. expected passing
- +62.7 pp
Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.
Long passing
3 attempts
- Actual
- 100.0%
- Pass difficulty
- 67.1%
Progression profile
Progressive-pass rate
11.1%
Pressure-pass rate
26.7%
Average forward distance
0.7 m
Positive forward distance / 100
439.8 m
Final-third entries / 100
8.9
Campos visualization
Pass map
Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.
Showing 1–45 of 45 passes
CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
- Pass difficulty
- 99.6%
- Outcome
- Completed
- Attacking impact
- -0.0031
- Value before
- 0.0056
- Value after
- 0.0025
- Length
- 29.5 m
- Context
- Standard
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.
Similar playing styles
Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.
100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.
Playing-style similarity unavailable
V3.3B similarity requires an outfield player with at least 50 passes and 29 carries.
Sample support uses the lower observed-match count in each pair. Lower coverage means a measured profile may vary more with additional matches; it never changes the style similarity or ranking.