FSFootyScout
PlayersTeam IntelligenceScoutingLeaderboardCompareArchetypesModel

FootyScout · Football scouting and analytics

Based on available StatsBomb 2023/24 Bundesliga event data.

Player profile

Lukas Kübler

Freiburg · Left Back · DEF

Matches observed1
Pass attempts28
Limited sample

Actual completion

82.1%

23 completed passes

Pass difficulty

80.9%

How difficult a pass was to complete.

Actual vs. expected passing

+1.2 pp

+0.3 completions vs model expectation

Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.

Player intelligence

Position profile

DEF context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.

Insufficient eligible position metrics for a meaningful radar.

Style

Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.

Pass difficulty

80.9%

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 23 eligible peers · sample 28

requires 100 passes

Under-pressure pass rate

3.6%

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 23 eligible peers · sample 28

requires 100 passes

Progressive pass rate

21.4%

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 23 eligible peers · sample 28

requires 100 passes

Long-pass rate

17.9%

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 23 eligible peers · sample 28

requires 100 passes

Average forward distance

6.2 units

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 23 eligible peers · sample 28

requires 100 passes

Positive forward distance / 100 passes

937.9 units

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 23 eligible peers · sample 28

requires 100 passes

Final-third entries / 100 passes

14.286

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 23 eligible peers · sample 28

requires 100 passes

Carry share of actions

41.7%

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 94 eligible peers · sample 48

requires 63 actions

Progressive carry rate

0.0%

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 87 eligible peers · sample 20

requires 29 carries

Progressive action rate

12.5%

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 94 eligible peers · sample 48

requires 63 actions

Under-pressure action rate

8.3%

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 94 eligible peers · sample 48

requires 63 actions

Shots / observed match

1.00 / match

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 4 eligible peers · sample 1

requires 20 shots

xG / shot

3.2%

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 4 eligible peers · sample 1

requires 20 shots

Performance

Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.

Actual vs. expected passing

+1.2 pp

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 23 eligible peers · sample 28

requires 100 passes

Under-pressure completion above expected

+7.7 pp

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 13 eligible peers · sample 1

requires 20 pressure passes

Progressive completion above expected

+8.8 pp

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 17 eligible peers · sample 6

requires 20 progressive passes

Long-pass completion above expected

+12.8 pp

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 21 eligible peers · sample 5

requires 20 long passes

Goals above expected

-0.032

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 4 eligible peers · sample 1

requires 20 shots

Overall impact / 100 actions

-0.097

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 94 eligible peers · sample 48

requires 63 actions

Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.

Passing impact / 100 passes

-0.180

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 94 eligible peers · sample 28

requires 36 passes

Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.

Carrying impact / 100 carries

0.020

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 87 eligible peers · sample 20

requires 29 carries

Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.

Progressive-action impact / 100 actions

-0.076

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 94 eligible peers · sample 48

requires 63 actions

Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.

Under-pressure impact / 100 actions

0.030

Unavailable among DEF players

n = 94 eligible peers · sample 48

requires 63 actions

Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.

Playing style

Archetype unavailable

Limited sample for archetype analysis: requires 50 passes.

Archetypes describe outfield playing tendencies, not quality, ability, or rank.

Role Fit — Bayer Leverkusen

Role Fit unavailable

Role Fit requires at least 50 passes and 29 carries in the product sample.

Expected Goals

Non-penalty shooting

Goals above expected is descriptive for this observed sample, not a definitive finishing-skill rating.

Limited sample

Shots

1

1 matches observed

Goals

0

Total xG

0.0

Goals above expected

-0.0

xG / shot

0.0

0.0% goals / shot

Limited sample: fewer than 20 non-penalty shots.

Campos visualization

Shot map

Non-penalty xG is encoded by marker size and color. Preserved penalties have no modeled xG.

Shots1
Goals0
xG0.03
xG0.00 – 1.00
Green outline = GoalNormal outline = Non-goal

Attacking impact

Impact of passes and carries

Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.

Limited sample

Overall impact / 100 actions

-0.097

Passing impact / 100 passes

-0.180

Carrying impact / 100 carries

+0.020

Progressive-action impact / 100 actions

-0.076

Under-pressure impact / 100 actions

+0.030

48 actions · 28 passes · 20 carries · 50.0% increased attacking value

Campos visualization

Carry value map

Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.

Situational execution

Under pressure

1 attempts

Limited sample
Actual
100.0%
Pass difficulty
92.3%
Actual vs. expected passing
+7.7 pp

Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.

Progressive passing

6 attempts

Limited sample
Actual
50.0%
Pass difficulty
41.2%
Actual vs. expected passing
+8.8 pp

Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.

Long passing

5 attempts

Limited sample
Actual
80.0%
Pass difficulty
67.2%

Progression profile

Progressive-pass rate

21.4%

Pressure-pass rate

3.6%

Average forward distance

6.2 m

Positive forward distance / 100

937.9 m

Final-third entries / 100

14.3

Campos visualization

Pass map

Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.

Showing 1–28 of 28 passes

Pass subset

CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
Pass difficulty
89.1%
Outcome
Incomplete
Attacking impact
-0.0055
Value before
0.0055
Value after
0.0000
Length
11.8 m
Context
Standard
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.

Similar playing styles

Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.

100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.

Playing-style similarity unavailable

V3.3B similarity requires an outfield player with at least 50 passes and 29 carries.

Sample support uses the lower observed-match count in each pair. Lower coverage means a measured profile may vary more with additional matches; it never changes the style similarity or ranking.

Actual vs. expected passing
+12.8 pp

Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.