FSFootyScout
PlayersTeam IntelligenceScoutingLeaderboardCompareArchetypesModel

FootyScout · Football scouting and analytics

Based on available StatsBomb 2023/24 Bundesliga event data.

Player profile

Harry Kane

Bayern Munich · Center Forward · FWD

Matches observed2
Pass attempts29
Limited sample

Actual completion

58.6%

17 completed passes

Pass difficulty

69.2%

How difficult a pass was to complete.

Actual vs. expected passing

-10.6 pp

-3.1 completions vs model expectation

Actual pass completion compared with the model's expected completion.

Player intelligence

Position profile

FWD context · Each percentile is an empirical rank among eligible players in the same broad position group. Percentiles are not ratings.

Insufficient eligible position metrics for a meaningful radar.

Style

Tendencies describe what a player attempts; higher is not automatically better.

Pass difficulty

69.2%

Unavailable among FWD players

n = 3 eligible peers · sample 29

requires 100 passes

Under-pressure pass rate

24.1%

Unavailable among FWD players

n = 3 eligible peers · sample 29

requires 100 passes

Progressive pass rate

24.1%

Unavailable among FWD players

n = 3 eligible peers · sample 29

requires 100 passes

Long-pass rate

20.7%

Unavailable among FWD players

n = 3 eligible peers · sample 29

requires 100 passes

Average forward distance

6.0 units

Unavailable among FWD players

n = 3 eligible peers · sample 29

requires 100 passes

Positive forward distance / 100 passes

1026.2 units

Unavailable among FWD players

n = 3 eligible peers · sample 29

requires 100 passes

Final-third entries / 100 passes

13.793

Unavailable among FWD players

n = 3 eligible peers · sample 29

requires 100 passes

Carry share of actions

55.9%

Unavailable among FWD players

n = 20 eligible peers · sample 59

requires 63 actions

Progressive carry rate

3.0%

18th percentile among FWD players

n = 20 eligible peers · sample 33

Progressive action rate

11.9%

Unavailable among FWD players

n = 20 eligible peers · sample 59

requires 63 actions

Under-pressure action rate

32.2%

Unavailable among FWD players

n = 20 eligible peers · sample 59

requires 63 actions

Shots / observed match

1.50 / match

Unavailable among FWD players

n = 2 eligible peers · sample 3

requires 20 shots

xG / shot

19.3%

Unavailable among FWD players

n = 2 eligible peers · sample 3

requires 20 shots

Performance

Observed execution or model-derived output relative to opportunities.

Actual vs. expected passing

-10.6 pp

Unavailable among FWD players

n = 3 eligible peers · sample 29

requires 100 passes

Under-pressure completion above expected

-19.3 pp

Unavailable among FWD players

n = 3 eligible peers · sample 7

requires 20 pressure passes

Progressive completion above expected

-23.6 pp

Unavailable among FWD players

n = 3 eligible peers · sample 7

requires 20 progressive passes

Long-pass completion above expected

-10.3 pp

Unavailable among FWD players

n = 1 eligible peers · sample 6

requires 20 long passes

Goals above expected

0.420

Unavailable among FWD players

n = 2 eligible peers · sample 3

requires 20 shots

Overall impact / 100 actions

-0.233

Unavailable among FWD players

n = 20 eligible peers · sample 59

requires 63 actions

Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.

Passing impact / 100 passes

-0.569

Unavailable among FWD players

n = 19 eligible peers · sample 26

requires 36 passes

Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.

Carrying impact / 100 carries

0.031

5th percentile among FWD players

n = 20 eligible peers · sample 33

Moderate split-half stability; descriptive rather than latent ability.

Progressive-action impact / 100 actions

-0.082

Unavailable among FWD players

n = 20 eligible peers · sample 59

requires 63 actions

Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.

Under-pressure impact / 100 actions

-0.004

Unavailable among FWD players

n = 20 eligible peers · sample 59

requires 63 actions

Weak split-half stability in the current 34-match product cohort.

Playing style

Archetype unavailable

Limited sample for archetype analysis: requires 50 passes.

Archetypes describe outfield playing tendencies, not quality, ability, or rank.

Role Fit — Bayer Leverkusen

Role Fit unavailable

Role Fit requires at least 50 passes and 29 carries in the product sample.

Expected Goals

Non-penalty shooting

Goals above expected is descriptive for this observed sample, not a definitive finishing-skill rating.

Limited sample

Shots

3

2 matches observed

Goals

1

Total xG

0.6

Goals above expected

+0.4

xG / shot

0.2

33.3% goals / shot

Limited sample: fewer than 20 non-penalty shots.

Campos visualization

Shot map

Non-penalty xG is encoded by marker size and color. Preserved penalties have no modeled xG.

Shots3
Goals1
xG0.58
xG0.00 – 1.00
Foot
Corner
Green outline = GoalNormal outline = Non-goal

Attacking impact

Impact of passes and carries

Measures how much each pass or carry changed the expected attacking value of a possession. Positive values improved the attack; negative values reduced it.

Limited sample

Overall impact / 100 actions

-0.233

Passing impact / 100 passes

-0.569

Carrying impact / 100 carries

+0.031

Progressive-action impact / 100 actions

-0.082

Under-pressure impact / 100 actions

-0.004

59 actions · 26 passes · 33 carries · 40.7% increased attacking value

Campos visualization

Carry value map

Exact StatsBomb carry start/end locations. Green increases modeled possession value; coral decreases it.

Situational execution

Under pressure

7 attempts

Limited sample
Actual
57.1%
Pass difficulty
76.4%
Actual vs. expected passing
-19.3 pp

Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.

Progressive passing

7 attempts

Limited sample
Actual
14.3%
Pass difficulty
37.9%
Actual vs. expected passing
-23.6 pp

Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.

Long passing

6 attempts

Limited sample
Actual
33.3%
Pass difficulty
43.7%

Progression profile

Progressive-pass rate

24.1%

Pressure-pass rate

24.1%

Average forward distance

6.0 m

Positive forward distance / 100

1026.2 m

Final-third entries / 100

13.8

Campos visualization

Pass map

Attacking left to right. Switch between xPass execution difficulty and possession attacking impact.

Showing 1–29 of 29 passes

Pass subset

CompletedIncompleteStronger line = greater pass difficultyThicker line = progressive or under pressure
Pass difficulty
1.7%
Outcome
Incomplete
Attacking impact
—
Value before
—
Value after
—
Length
22.6 m
Context
Under pressure
Event clocks are not retained in the pass API.

Similar playing styles

Style similarity compares position-relative playing style across passing and carrying tendencies. Scores are not ability ratings.

100 means identical observed profiles; 50 is about the median same-position playing style match. Not a probability.

Playing-style similarity unavailable

V3.3B similarity requires an outfield player with at least 50 passes and 29 carries.

Sample support uses the lower observed-match count in each pair. Lower coverage means a measured profile may vary more with additional matches; it never changes the style similarity or ranking.

Actual vs. expected passing
-10.3 pp

Limited sample — interpret this split cautiously.